From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add a sentinel frame
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E538770.6070209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E52173B.1030800@suse.cz>
(I hate jet lag, I'm never up at 7am, well ok ...)
> I got back to the mainline/"sentinel" problem and have found that it happens when a program's function is called from a gdb prompt.
>
> To reproduce create a very simple program:
> int func(int arg) { return 2*arg; }
> int main(int argc) { return func(argc); }
>
> Then run mainline GDB on x86-64:
> (gdb) break main
> (gdb) run
> (gdb) print func(1)
> ../../gdb-head/gdb/sentinel-frame.c:102: internal-error: Function sentinal_frame_pop called
> A problem internal to GDB has been detected. Further
> debugging may prove unreliable.
> Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
>
> Attached is a backtrace of this failing GDB.
> Any ideas?
Yes!
> #6 0x00000000005446d1 in sentinel_frame_pop (frame=0x82c100, cache=0x82c130,
> regcache=0x850610) at ../../gdb-head/gdb/sentinel-frame.c:102
At this point GDB is hosed.
As I mentioned before, popping the sentinal frame is meaningless so the
question is, where did that frame come from.
A wild guess is that it is trying to pop the dummy frame having finished
the inferior function call. A confirmation is:
(gdb) break func
(gdb) print func(1)
It should manage to stop in func, the stack being something like
(assuming bt doesn't also internal error :-):
(gdb) bt
.... func ...
.... <dummy-frame> ...
.... main ...
Returning from func(), causing the dummy-frame to be discarded should
then trigger things:
(gdb) finish
... barf ...
Can you confirm that the PC for this frame is falling in the stack dummy?
> #7 0x00000000004e6692 in frame_pop (frame=0x82c100)
> at ../../gdb-head/gdb/frame.c:164
> #8 0x000000000048a3c4 in normal_stop () at ../../gdb-head/gdb/infrun.c:3113
The code reads:
if (stop_stack_dummy)
{
/* Pop the empty frame that contains the stack dummy. POP_FRAME
ends with a setting of the current frame, so we can use that
next. */
frame_pop (get_current_frame ());
/* Set stop_pc to what it was before we called the function.
Can't rely on restore_inferior_status because that only gets
called if we don't stop in the called function. */
stop_pc = read_pc ();
select_frame (get_current_frame ());
}
Hmm, not so good. I was expecting something involving sentinal frames.
Anyway ...
get_current_frame() does the sequence:
if (current_frame == NULL)
{
This is where the sentinel frame comes from.
struct frame_info *sentinel_frame =
create_sentinel_frame (current_regcache);
This is where it tries to unwind it back to the current frame (a dummy
frame in this case). Note that unwind_to_current_frame() calls
get_prev_frame().
if (catch_exceptions (uiout, unwind_to_current_frame, sentinel_frame,
NULL, RETURN_MASK_ERROR) != 0)
{
And if it fails, it does this:
/* Oops! Fake a current frame? Is this useful? It has a PC
of zero, for instance. */
current_frame = sentinel_frame;
}
}
So lets assume that get_prev_frame() is failing. It can do it two ways:
- noisily via an error() call such as when a memory read fails
(I don't think it is this 'cos we'd see that error).
- silently because get_prev_frame() thinks that chaining is invalid
(more likely)
So I think it is one of these tests going awall:
if (next_frame->level >= 0
&& !backtrace_below_main
&& inside_main_func (get_frame_pc (next_frame)))
/* Don't unwind past main(), bug always unwind the sentinel frame.
Note, this is done _before_ the frame has been marked as
previously unwound. That way if the user later decides to
allow unwinds past main(), that just happens. */
return NULL;
/* If we're inside the entry file, it isn't valid. */
/* NOTE: drow/2002-12-25: should there be a way to disable this
check? It assumes a single small entry file, and the way some
debug readers (e.g. dbxread) figure out which object is the
entry file is somewhat hokey. */
/* NOTE: cagney/2003-01-10: If there is a way of disabling this test
then it should probably be moved to before the ->prev_p test,
above. */
if (inside_entry_file (get_frame_pc (next_frame)))
return NULL;
The second looks worrying (the dummy frame breakpoint lives in the entry
file ...). Perhaphs something like:
if (dummy_frame_p (get_frame_pc (next_frame) != NULL
&& inside_entry_file (get_frame_pc (next_frame))
return NULL;
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-19 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-23 20:54 Andrew Cagney
2003-01-27 21:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-10 23:36 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-11 16:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-18 11:21 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-19 13:27 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-02-19 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 16:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 16:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 17:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 17:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 18:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 18:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 20:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 20:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 21:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 19:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 21:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 19:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-25 16:24 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-25 19:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25 21:00 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-25 21:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-26 8:04 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-27 18:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-28 13:02 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-28 15:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-05 17:38 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-03-05 18:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-06 16:00 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-03-06 20:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-06 22:42 ` [RFA] Dummy frames on x86-64 Michal Ludvig
2003-03-07 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25 22:41 ` [patch/rfc] Add a sentinel frame Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25 21:21 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E538770.6070209@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox