Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add a sentinel frame
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E5BF1AD.4010005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E5BD957.9010605@suse.cz>

Michael,

A shallow analysis of the problem is that, when the PC is in the frame 
dummy, read_fp() (i.e., cfi_read_fp()) returns NULL (an invalid frame). 
  The new code is checking for this and bailing out.  Disabling the test 
doesn't exactly improve things:

(gdb) finish
Inside legacy frame
Run till exit from #0  marker2 (a=99) at 
/home/cagney/PENDING/2003-02-24-prev-checks/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.c:49
cfi_read_fp -> 0x0000000000000000
Can't pop dummy frame!
(gdb)

since the search for a NULL frame in the dummy_frame_stack will fail 
(see dummy_frame_pop).

Andrew


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-25 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-23 20:54 Andrew Cagney
2003-01-27 21:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-10 23:36 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-11 16:48   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-18 11:21     ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-19 13:27       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 14:04         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 16:46           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 16:56             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 17:11               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:17                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 17:46                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 17:56                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 18:36                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 18:52                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 20:22                           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19 20:39                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 21:21                               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 19:32                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-19 21:45                               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 19:32                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-25 16:24         ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-25 19:43           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25 21:00             ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-25 21:12               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-26  8:04                 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-27 18:27                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-28 13:02                     ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-28 15:48                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-05 17:38                         ` Michal Ludvig
2003-03-05 18:25                           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-06 16:00                             ` Michal Ludvig
2003-03-06 20:13                               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-06 22:42                                 ` [RFA] Dummy frames on x86-64 Michal Ludvig
2003-03-07 14:50                                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-25 22:41               ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-02-25 21:21 [patch/rfc] Add a sentinel frame Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E5BF1AD.4010005@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox