From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Eliminate char buf[MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE]
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 06:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E3B6BCF.6090601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030201061310.GB22468@gnat.com>
> I have a simple (stupid?) question: Generaly speaking, is there a
> prefered form between the following two?
>
> max_register_raw_size (current_gdbarch)
>
> or
>
> MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE
>
> These two forms are exactly equivalent, but in most occurences I've seen
> in the code, we used the macro... But maybe you used the non-macro form
> to show that we do an alloca because the size of the buffer is not known
> at compile-time?
Old == MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE, MAX_REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE.
New == max_register_size (current_gdbarch)
The old macro's will eventually go away.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-01 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-31 22:58 Andrew Cagney
2003-01-31 23:20 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-01-31 23:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-01 1:36 ` Michael Snyder
2003-02-01 6:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-01 6:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-02-01 6:40 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-02-02 5:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-01 17:33 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E3B6BCF.6090601@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox