Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
	Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>, cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] Don't display values in output of pc-fp.exp
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 15:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC85741.6090801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1pttja9yj.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>

> On Tue, 05 Nov 2002 17:54:27 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:
> 
> 
>>> The tests in pc-fp.exp display the actual values of $pc and $fp in
>>> their PASS messages.  That makes regression testing a bit more
>>> annoying for me: the value of $fp changes with every change I make
>>> to GDB.  Is it okay to tweak the PASS messages not to display those
>>> values?
> 
> 
>> As far as I know, anything in trailing paren should be ignored when
>> comparing test results.  You might want to tweak your script (I've
>> attached mine) to do this.
> 
> 
> Wow: your script is complicated.  I just do
> 
>   diff -u (first file) (second file) | grep -v schedlock
> 
> I could do something more complicated than that, of course; on the
> other hand, I'm still not convinced that I should.  It seems to me
> that details like the value of the variables in question shouldn't be
> in gdb.sum: if I want that level of information, I'll look in gdb.log.
> I think there's a virtue in having gdb.sum in a format that's easily
> checkable without worrying about parsing issues: the easier it is to
> do regression testing, the more often it will happen.

Ah, you've never had to cross compare 64 different targets to check that 
their results are equivalent :-)

Andrew



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-05 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-05 14:14 David Carlton
2002-11-05 14:17 ` Michael Snyder
2002-11-05 14:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-05 15:11   ` David Carlton
2002-11-05 15:20     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-05 15:41     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
     [not found]     ` <3DC98B56.2861A478@redhat.com>
2002-11-06 14:57       ` David Carlton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DC85741.6090801@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=cagney@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
    --cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox