* [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples
@ 2002-08-23 13:23 Andrew Cagney
2002-08-23 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-23 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hello,
This patch just switches the use of <- and -> in the remote protocol
example. I think it reads better vis:
-> Z?
<- OK
(well at least for a left to right reader :-/).
ok?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples
2002-08-23 13:23 [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-08-23 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-23 13:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-24 2:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-08-23 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:14:25PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch just switches the use of <- and -> in the remote protocol
> example. I think it reads better vis:
>
> -> Z?
> <- OK
>
> (well at least for a left to right reader :-/).
(No patch, but) I agree. -> should be what the client is sending,
since it's a client manual.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples
2002-08-23 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-08-23 13:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-24 2:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-23 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 385 bytes --]
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:14:25PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch just switches the use of <- and -> in the remote protocol
>> example. I think it reads better vis:
>>
>> -> Z?
>> <- OK
>>
>> (well at least for a left to right reader :-/).
>
>
> (No patch, but) I agree. -> should be what the client is sending,
> since it's a client manual.
>
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2662 bytes --]
2002-08-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* gdb.texinfo (Examples): Use ``->'' for a packet send and ``<-''
for a packet receive.
Index: doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.114
diff -p -r1.114 gdb.texinfo
*** doc/gdb.texinfo 19 Aug 2002 22:09:03 -0000 1.114
--- doc/gdb.texinfo 23 Aug 2002 20:06:34 -0000
*************** protocol---for example, if there is only
*** 14248,14254 ****
machine, you might want your program to do something special if it
recognizes a packet meant for @value{GDBN}.
! In the examples below, @samp{<-} and @samp{->} are used to indicate
transmitted and received data respectfully.
@cindex protocol, @value{GDBN} remote serial
--- 14248,14254 ----
machine, you might want your program to do something special if it
recognizes a packet meant for @value{GDBN}.
! In the examples below, @samp{->} and @samp{<-} are used to indicate
transmitted and received data respectfully.
@cindex protocol, @value{GDBN} remote serial
*************** the package was received correctly) or @
*** 14290,14297 ****
retransmission):
@smallexample
! <- @code{$}@var{packet-data}@code{#}@var{checksum}
! -> @code{+}
@end smallexample
@noindent
--- 14290,14297 ----
retransmission):
@smallexample
! -> @code{$}@var{packet-data}@code{#}@var{checksum}
! <- @code{+}
@end smallexample
@noindent
*************** Example sequence of a target being re-st
*** 15082,15110 ****
does not get any direct output:
@smallexample
! <- @code{R00}
! -> @code{+}
@emph{target restarts}
! <- @code{?}
! -> @code{+}
! -> @code{T001:1234123412341234}
<- @code{+}
@end smallexample
Example sequence of a target being stepped by a single instruction:
@smallexample
! <- @code{G1445@dots{}}
! -> @code{+}
! <- @code{s}
! -> @code{+}
! @emph{time passes}
! -> @code{T001:1234123412341234}
<- @code{+}
! <- @code{g}
-> @code{+}
! -> @code{1455@dots{}}
<- @code{+}
@end smallexample
@include gpl.texi
--- 15082,15110 ----
does not get any direct output:
@smallexample
! -> @code{R00}
! <- @code{+}
@emph{target restarts}
! -> @code{?}
<- @code{+}
+ <- @code{T001:1234123412341234}
+ -> @code{+}
@end smallexample
Example sequence of a target being stepped by a single instruction:
@smallexample
! -> @code{G1445@dots{}}
<- @code{+}
! -> @code{s}
! <- @code{+}
! @emph{time passes}
! <- @code{T001:1234123412341234}
-> @code{+}
! -> @code{g}
<- @code{+}
+ <- @code{1455@dots{}}
+ -> @code{+}
@end smallexample
@include gpl.texi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples
2002-08-23 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-23 13:32 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-08-24 2:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-25 12:17 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2002-08-24 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: drow; +Cc: ac131313, gdb-patches
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:24:05 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> >
> > -> Z?
> > <- OK
> >
> > (well at least for a left to right reader :-/).
>
> (No patch, but) I agree. -> should be what the client is sending,
> since it's a client manual.
I'd suggest to try to use @result{} for the former, and see if it
gives better results in print.
Otherwise, I don't mind the change.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples
2002-08-24 2:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2002-08-25 12:17 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-08-25 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: drow, gdb-patches
>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:24:05 -0400
>> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>
>> >
>> > -> Z?
>> > <- OK
>> >
>> > (well at least for a left to right reader :-/).
>
>>
>> (No patch, but) I agree. -> should be what the client is sending,
>> since it's a client manual.
>
>
> I'd suggest to try to use @result{} for the former, and see if it
> gives better results in print.
>
> Otherwise, I don't mind the change.
It looks better but the display ends up looking something like:
=> Z?
<- OK
(i.e., the send doesn't match the receive).
I've checked this in,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-25 19:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-23 13:23 [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples Andrew Cagney
2002-08-23 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-23 13:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-24 2:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-25 12:17 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox