From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14431 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2002 09:18:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14419 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2002 09:18:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heimdall.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2002 09:18:49 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BRT88721; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 12:18:45 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 02:21:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: drow@mvista.com Message-Id: <7458-Sat24Aug2002122101+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: ac131313@ges.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20020823202405.GA30960@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:24:05 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] switch <- and -> in remote examples Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3D6697A1.6010001@ges.redhat.com> <20020823202405.GA30960@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00790.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:24:05 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > -> Z? > > <- OK > > > > (well at least for a left to right reader :-/). > > (No patch, but) I agree. -> should be what the client is sending, > since it's a client manual. I'd suggest to try to use @result{} for the former, and see if it gives better results in print. Otherwise, I don't mind the change.