[PATCH/RFA] Add xfail for i386 BSD's

[PATCH/RFA] Add xfail for i386 BSD's

[Mark Kettenis]

I'm convinced this failure is caused by a kernel bug present on all
i386 BSD's.  Seen on FreeBSD and OpenBSD, and since OpenBSD is so
similar to OpenBSD, I expect it to be "broken" too.  The original
BSD was already there, I just made sure the pattern catches the other
ones too.

Ok to check this in?

Mark


Index: testsuite/ChangeLog
from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>

	* gdb.base/interrupt.exp: Setup xfail for all i386 BSD's on "call
	function when asleep" test.

Index: testsuite/gdb.base/interrupt.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/interrupt.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 interrupt.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/interrupt.exp 29 Oct 2001 17:38:11 -0000 1.4
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/interrupt.exp 4 Jul 2002 14:44:37 -0000
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ if ![file exists $binfile] then {
 
 		setup_xfail "sparc*-*-solaris2*"
 		setup_xfail "mips-*-ultrix*"
-		setup_xfail "i386*-*-bsd*"
+		setup_xfail "i*86-*-*bsd*"
 		setup_xfail "i*86-*-solaris2*"
 		setup_xfail "*-*-sysv4*"
 		setup_xfail "vax-*-*"

Re: [PATCH/RFA] Add xfail for i386 BSD's

[Andrew Cagney]

> I'm convinced this failure is caused by a kernel bug present on all
> i386 BSD's.  Seen on FreeBSD and OpenBSD, and since OpenBSD is so
> similar to OpenBSD, I expect it to be "broken" too.  The original
> BSD was already there, I just made sure the pattern catches the other
> ones too.
> 
> Ok to check this in?

(I'm, for the moment, picking up more testsuite stuff for Fernando, 
Fernando is concentrating on getting the KFAIL stuff resolved).

> Index: testsuite/ChangeLog
> from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
> 
> 	* gdb.base/interrupt.exp: Setup xfail for all i386 BSD's on "call
> 	function when asleep" test.
> 

Yes (but I suspect that one of the above OpenBSDs was likely ment to be 
NetBSD :-)

Andrew

Re: [PATCH/RFA] Add xfail for i386 BSD's

[Mark Kettenis]

   Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:06:40 -0400
   From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>

   > I'm convinced this failure is caused by a kernel bug present on all
   > i386 BSD's.  Seen on FreeBSD and OpenBSD, and since OpenBSD is so
   > similar to OpenBSD, I expect it to be "broken" too.  The original
   > BSD was already there, I just made sure the pattern catches the other
   > ones too.
   > 
   > Ok to check this in?

   Yes (but I suspect that one of the above OpenBSDs was likely ment to be 
   NetBSD :-)

Right!

Checked in now.

Mark