From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3679 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2002 21:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3672 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 21:06:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 21:06:46 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990303D15; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:06:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D2CA1E0.90201@ges.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:14:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Add xfail for i386 BSD's References: <200207041448.g64EmsU08483@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 > I'm convinced this failure is caused by a kernel bug present on all > i386 BSD's. Seen on FreeBSD and OpenBSD, and since OpenBSD is so > similar to OpenBSD, I expect it to be "broken" too. The original > BSD was already there, I just made sure the pattern catches the other > ones too. > > Ok to check this in? (I'm, for the moment, picking up more testsuite stuff for Fernando, Fernando is concentrating on getting the KFAIL stuff resolved). > Index: testsuite/ChangeLog > from Mark Kettenis > > * gdb.base/interrupt.exp: Setup xfail for all i386 BSD's on "call > function when asleep" test. > Yes (but I suspect that one of the above OpenBSDs was likely ment to be NetBSD :-) Andrew