* [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
@ 2002-05-13 9:31 Michal Ludvig
2002-05-13 9:43 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2002-05-13 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi all,
this simple patch mysteriously solves problems that we have had on
x86-64 with stack unwinding. Can I commit? I believe so :-)
2002-05-13 Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
* dwarf2cfi.c (context_cpy): Copy registers correctly.
(update_context): Use __func__ in notes.
Index: dwarf2cfi.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2cfi.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -c -3 -p -r1.4 dwarf2cfi.c
*** dwarf2cfi.c 7 May 2002 11:22:54 -0000 1.4
--- dwarf2cfi.c 13 May 2002 16:24:00 -0000
*************** static void
*** 318,325 ****
--- 318,329 ----
context_cpy (struct context *dst, struct context *src)
{
int regs_size = sizeof (struct context_reg) * NUM_REGS;
+ struct context_reg *dreg;
+ dreg = dst->reg;
*dst = *src;
+ dst->reg = dreg;
+
memcpy (dst->reg, src->reg, regs_size);
}
^L
*************** update_context (struct context *context,
*** 1301,1307 ****
orig_context->reg[fs->regs.reg[i].loc.reg].loc.addr;
default:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
! "cfi_update_context: unknown register rule");
}
break;
case REG_SAVED_EXP:
--- 1305,1311 ----
orig_context->reg[fs->regs.reg[i].loc.reg].loc.addr;
default:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
! "%s: unknown register rule", __func__);
}
break;
case REG_SAVED_EXP:
*************** update_context (struct context *context,
*** 1319,1326 ****
break;
default:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
! "cfi_update_context: unknown register rule");
!
}
get_reg ((char *) &context->ra, context, fs->retaddr_column);
unwind_tmp_obstack_free ();
--- 1323,1329 ----
break;
default:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
! "%s: unknown register rule", __func__);
}
get_reg ((char *) &context->ra, context, fs->retaddr_column);
unwind_tmp_obstack_free ();
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
2002-05-13 9:31 [RFA] Dwarf2 fix Michal Ludvig
@ 2002-05-13 9:43 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-05-13 10:04 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-05-23 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2002-05-13 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Ludvig; +Cc: gdb-patches
Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz> writes:
> Hi all,
> this simple patch mysteriously solves problems that we have had on
> x86-64 with stack unwinding. Can I commit? I believe so :-)
What about committing to the 5.2 branch? Is a 5.2.1 planned?
>
> 2002-05-13 Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
> * dwarf2cfi.c (context_cpy): Copy registers correctly.
> (update_context): Use __func__ in notes.
>
> Index: dwarf2cfi.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2cfi.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -c -3 -p -r1.4 dwarf2cfi.c
> *** dwarf2cfi.c 7 May 2002 11:22:54 -0000 1.4
> --- dwarf2cfi.c 13 May 2002 16:24:00 -0000
> *************** static void
> *** 318,325 ****
> --- 318,329 ----
> context_cpy (struct context *dst, struct context *src)
> {
> int regs_size = sizeof (struct context_reg) * NUM_REGS;
> + struct context_reg *dreg;
>
> + dreg = dst->reg;
> *dst = *src;
> + dst->reg = dreg;
> +
Can you add a comment here, why this is needed?
> memcpy (dst->reg, src->reg, regs_size);
> }
>[...]
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
2002-05-13 9:43 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2002-05-13 10:04 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-05-13 10:21 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-05-23 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2002-05-13 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: gdb-patches
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz> writes:
>> context_cpy (struct context *dst, struct context *src)
>> {
>> int regs_size = sizeof (struct context_reg) * NUM_REGS;
>>+ struct context_reg *dreg;
>>
>>+ dreg = dst->reg;
>> *dst = *src;
>>+ dst->reg = dreg;
>>+
>> memcpy (dst->reg, src->reg, regs_size);
>> }
> Can you add a comment here, why this is needed?
Structure dst contains a pointer to an array of registers of a given
frame as well as src does. This array was already allocated before dst
was passed to context_cpy but the pointer to it was overriden by
'*dst = *src' and the array was lost. This led to the situation, that
I've had a copy of src placed in dst, but both of them pointed to the
same regs array and thus I've sometimes blindly rewritten it.
Now I save the pointer before I copy src to dst, return it back after
that and copy the registers into their new place finally.
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
2002-05-13 10:04 ` Michal Ludvig
@ 2002-05-13 10:21 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-05-13 10:32 ` Michal Ludvig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2002-05-13 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Ludvig; +Cc: gdb-patches
Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz> writes:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz> writes:
>
>>> context_cpy (struct context *dst, struct context *src)
>>> {
>>> int regs_size = sizeof (struct context_reg) * NUM_REGS;
>>>+ struct context_reg *dreg;
>>>
>>>+ dreg = dst->reg;
>>> *dst = *src;
>>>+ dst->reg = dreg;
>>>+
>>> memcpy (dst->reg, src->reg, regs_size);
>>> }
>
> > Can you add a comment here, why this is needed?
>
> Structure dst contains a pointer to an array of registers of a given
> frame as well as src does. This array was already allocated before dst
> was passed to context_cpy but the pointer to it was overriden by
> '*dst = *src' and the array was lost. This led to the situation, that
> I've had a copy of src placed in dst, but both of them pointed to the
> same regs array and thus I've sometimes blindly rewritten it.
> Now I save the pointer before I copy src to dst, return it back after
> that and copy the registers into their new place finally.
thanks for the explanation. I wanted to see a comment in the code...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
2002-05-13 10:21 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2002-05-13 10:32 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-05-13 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2002-05-13 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> thanks for the explanation. I wanted to see a comment in the code...
I see :-))
static void
context_cpy (struct context *dst, struct context *src)
{
int regs_size = sizeof (struct context_reg) * NUM_REGS;
struct context_reg *dreg;
/* Save a pointer to an already allocated dst->reg
before overriding dst by src. */
dreg = dst->reg;
*dst = *src;
dst->reg = dreg;
memcpy (dst->reg, src->reg, regs_size);
}
Better now? ;-)
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
2002-05-13 10:32 ` Michal Ludvig
@ 2002-05-13 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-14 3:02 ` Michal Ludvig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-05-13 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Ludvig; +Cc: gdb-patches
>
> /* Save a pointer to an already allocated dst->reg
> before overriding dst by src. */
Can I suggest the entire paragraph you posted - better to much than too
little information (well at least in the case of GDB :-).
enjoy,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
2002-05-13 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-05-14 3:02 ` Michal Ludvig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2002-05-14 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>
>> /* Save a pointer to an already allocated dst->reg
>> before overriding dst by src. */
> Can I suggest the entire paragraph you posted - better to much than too
> little information (well at least in the case of GDB :-).
OK, Comitted to both mainline and branch with with the long description.
> enjoy,
> Andrew
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA] Dwarf2 fix
2002-05-13 9:43 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-05-13 10:04 ` Michal Ludvig
@ 2002-05-23 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-05-23 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: Michal Ludvig, gdb-patches
> Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz> writes:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>> this simple patch mysteriously solves problems that we have had on
>> x86-64 with stack unwinding. Can I commit? I believe so :-)
>
>
> What about committing to the 5.2 branch? Is a 5.2.1 planned?
Probably. Decide in a few weeks once it is clear how many patches the
branch has accumulated.
BTW, I think there are already sufficient changes in the trunk to
warrent a 5.3 release.
enjoy,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-24 2:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-13 9:31 [RFA] Dwarf2 fix Michal Ludvig
2002-05-13 9:43 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-05-13 10:04 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-05-13 10:21 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-05-13 10:32 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-05-13 14:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-14 3:02 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-05-23 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox