Re: [patch:arm] Don't use NUM_PSEUDO_REGS in arm_gdbarch_init()

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 402 bytes --]


> Argh! As you will see from the comment, I'd already fixed a similar 
> problem to avoid using SIZEOF_FRAME_SAVED_REGS, but missed that part.  Can 
> you update the comment as well?
> 
>   /* We can't use SIZEOF_FRAME_SAVED_REGS here, since that still
>      references the old architecture vector, not the one we are
>      building here.  */
> 

(and NUM_REGS). I committed the attached.

Andrew



[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --]

Wed Apr 24 14:22:21 2002  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>
 
 	* arm-tdep.c (arm_gdbarch_init): Add comment that NUM_REGS nor
  	NUM_PSEUDO_REGS can be used.
 
Index: arm-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -c -r1.52 arm-tdep.c
*** arm-tdep.c	23 Apr 2002 18:10:06 -0000	1.52
--- arm-tdep.c	24 Apr 2002 18:21:17 -0000
***************
*** 3035,3040 ****
--- 3035,3043 ----
    if (prologue_cache.saved_regs != NULL)
      xfree (prologue_cache.saved_regs);
  
+   /* We can't use NUM_REGS nor NUM_PSEUDO_REGS here, since that still
+      references the old architecture vector, not the one we are
+      building here.  */
    prologue_cache.saved_regs = (CORE_ADDR *)
      xcalloc (1, (sizeof (CORE_ADDR)
  		 * (gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch)