Re: [patch:arm] Don't use NUM_PSEUDO_REGS in arm_gdbarch_init()

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

> Hello,
>> 
>> The macro NUM_PSEUDO_REGS refers to ``current_gdbarch'' and not 
>> ``gdbarch''.  Hence the equation in the patch was picking up the number 
>> of pseudo-registers from the previously selected architecture (which may 
>> not even be ARM), outch!  No wonder macro's are bad :-)
>> 
>> The attached calls gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs() directly with the correct 
>> architecture.  (It also fixes a core dump that my next patch will cause ...)
>> 
>> Committed as fairly obvious.
>> 
>> Andrew
>> 
>> 2002-04-20  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>
>> 
>> * arm-tdep.c (arm_gdbarch_init): Use gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs
>> instead of NUM_PSEUDO_REGS.
> 
> 
> Argh! As you will see from the comment, I'd already fixed a similar 
> problem to avoid using SIZEOF_FRAME_SAVED_REGS, but missed that part.  Can 
> you update the comment as well?

M'kay.

>   /* We can't use SIZEOF_FRAME_SAVED_REGS here, since that still
>      references the old architecture vector, not the one we are
>      building here.  */

BTW, once the patch:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg00711.html
goes through the problem should largely ``go away''.

Andrew