From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Disable [eE] packets by default
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C798723.4D4B@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C79867F.3000906@cygnus.com>
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a followup to the current discussion regarding the [Ee] packets.
> It disables them by default.
>
> While it is a brutal solution to a problem, it is also 6 days before 5.2
> branches. It also clears the slate for another attempt at this.
>
> Thoughts?
I think this is the right thing to do. Previously we had
no way to test the 'e' packet. Now that we do have, it is
seen to be buggy. This is like an unreliable optimization.
You can give the user the opportunity to use it if he chooses,
but you don't turn it on by default.
I would like to start discussing the right way to implement this.
For one thing, the current implementation has remote.c snatching
control away from infrun, and doing something completely
different from what infrun asked it to do. I'd like to have
the decision about whether to use step-over-range made in
infrun, not in the target layer.
> Andrew
>
> PS: There is no doco patch. This packet was never documented. Sigh :-(
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 2002-02-24 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * remote.c (_initialize_remote): By default, disable ``e'' and
> ``E'' step out-of-range packets.
>
> Index: remote.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.76
> diff -u -r1.76 remote.c
> --- remote.c 2002/02/10 04:08:42 1.76
> +++ remote.c 2002/02/25 00:19:23
> @@ -6099,6 +6099,10 @@
> show_remote_protocol_e_packet_cmd,
> &remote_set_cmdlist, &remote_show_cmdlist,
> 0);
> + /* Disable by default. The ``e'' packet has nasty interactions with
> + the threading code - it relies on global state. */
> + remote_protocol_e.detect = CMD_AUTO_BOOLEAN_FALSE;
> + update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_e);
>
> add_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_E,
> "E", "step-over-range-w-signal",
> @@ -6106,6 +6110,10 @@
> show_remote_protocol_E_packet_cmd,
> &remote_set_cmdlist, &remote_show_cmdlist,
> 0);
> + /* Disable by default. The ``e'' packet has nasty interactions with
> + the threading code - it relies on global state. */
> + remote_protocol_E.detect = CMD_AUTO_BOOLEAN_FALSE;
> + update_packet_config (&remote_protocol_E);
>
> add_packet_config_cmd (&remote_protocol_P,
> "P", "set-register",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-24 16:34 Andrew Cagney
2002-02-24 16:42 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2002-02-26 9:29 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-02-26 17:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-26 17:31 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C798723.4D4B@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox