* [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext
@ 2002-02-23 19:57 Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 20:47 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-23 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --]
Hello,
The attached deletes floatformat_arm_ext from include/floatformat.h and
libiberty/floatformat.c. As far as I know nothing uses it. GDB stopped
using it some time ago.
It has been replaced with the far more useful:
const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_big;
const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_littlebyte_bigword;
Any comments? If not I'll commit it in a few days.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1672 bytes --]
Index: ./include/ChangeLog
2002-02-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* floatformat.h (floatformat_arm_ext): Delete declaration.
Index: ./libiberty/ChangeLog
2002-02-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* floatformat.c (floatformat_arm_ext_big): Delete definition.
Index: ./include/floatformat.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/floatformat.h,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 floatformat.h
--- floatformat.h 2001/08/21 00:20:05 1.4
+++ floatformat.h 2002/02/24 03:51:10
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@
extern const struct floatformat floatformat_i960_ext;
extern const struct floatformat floatformat_m88110_ext;
extern const struct floatformat floatformat_m88110_harris_ext;
-extern const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext; /* deprecated. */
extern const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_big;
extern const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_littlebyte_bigword;
/* IA-64 Floating Point register spilt into memory. */
Index: ./libiberty/floatformat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/libiberty/floatformat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 floatformat.c
--- floatformat.c 2001/08/21 00:20:07 1.5
+++ floatformat.c 2002/02/24 03:51:16
@@ -103,13 +103,6 @@
floatformat_intbit_no,
"floatformat_m88110_ext_harris"
};
-const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext =
-{
- /* Bits 1 to 16 are unused. */
- floatformat_big, 96, 0, 17, 15, 0x3fff, 0x7fff, 32, 64,
- floatformat_intbit_yes,
- "floatformat_arm_ext"
-};
const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_big =
{
/* Bits 1 to 16 are unused. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext
2002-02-23 19:57 [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-23 20:47 ` DJ Delorie
2002-02-23 21:33 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2002-02-23 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches
> The attached deletes floatformat_arm_ext from include/floatformat.h and
> libiberty/floatformat.c. As far as I know nothing uses it. GDB stopped
> using it some time ago.
In general, I'm opposed to changes that reduce backward compatibility.
*How* long ago did someone actually use it? What's the chance of that
version still being in use by someone? Are there any bad side-effects
if we just leave it in for historical reasons?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext
2002-02-23 20:47 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2002-02-23 21:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 21:35 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-23 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DJ Delorie; +Cc: gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches
[I messed up a to line, original post at end]
> The attached deletes floatformat_arm_ext from include/floatformat.h and
>> libiberty/floatformat.c. As far as I know nothing uses it. GDB stopped
>> using it some time ago.
>
>
> In general, I'm opposed to changes that reduce backward compatibility.
> *How* long ago did someone actually use it? What's the chance of that
> version still being in use by someone? Are there any bad side-effects
> if we just leave it in for historical reasons?
The only useage of that floatformat that I'm aware of was removed
2001-08 by Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>.
The single format wasn't sufficient for a program trying to correctly
manipulate both big and little endian Arm floating points - hence the
two new formats.
GDB has a strong preference for flushing code it no longer needs. It
has the unfortunate habbit of rearing its head at later inopportune moments.
enjoy,
Andrew
----------------
> Hello,
>
> The attached deletes floatformat_arm_ext from include/floatformat.h and libiberty/floatformat.c. As far as I know nothing uses it. GDB stopped using it some time ago.
>
> It has been replaced with the far more useful:
>
> const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_big;
> const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_littlebyte_bigword;
>
> Any comments? If not I'll commit it in a few days.
> Andrew
>
>
>
> Index: ./include/ChangeLog
> 2002-02-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * floatformat.h (floatformat_arm_ext): Delete declaration.
>
> Index: ./libiberty/ChangeLog
> 2002-02-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * floatformat.c (floatformat_arm_ext_big): Delete definition.
>
> Index: ./include/floatformat.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/floatformat.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 floatformat.h
> --- floatformat.h 2001/08/21 00:20:05 1.4
> +++ floatformat.h 2002/02/24 03:51:10
> @@ -96,7 +96,6 @@
> extern const struct floatformat floatformat_i960_ext;
> extern const struct floatformat floatformat_m88110_ext;
> extern const struct floatformat floatformat_m88110_harris_ext;
> -extern const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext; /* deprecated. */
> extern const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_big;
> extern const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_littlebyte_bigword;
> /* IA-64 Floating Point register spilt into memory. */
> Index: ./libiberty/floatformat.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/libiberty/floatformat.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -r1.5 floatformat.c
> --- floatformat.c 2001/08/21 00:20:07 1.5
> +++ floatformat.c 2002/02/24 03:51:16
> @@ -103,13 +103,6 @@
> floatformat_intbit_no,
> "floatformat_m88110_ext_harris"
> };
> -const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext =
> -{
> - /* Bits 1 to 16 are unused. */
> - floatformat_big, 96, 0, 17, 15, 0x3fff, 0x7fff, 32, 64,
> - floatformat_intbit_yes,
> - "floatformat_arm_ext"
> -};
> const struct floatformat floatformat_arm_ext_big =
> {
> /* Bits 1 to 16 are unused. */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext
2002-02-23 21:33 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-23 21:35 ` DJ Delorie
2002-02-23 22:05 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2002-02-23 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches
> The single format wasn't sufficient for a program trying to correctly
> manipulate both big and little endian Arm floating points - hence the
> two new formats.
Is it safe to say that the code you're removing never actually worked,
then? If so, then there shouldn't be any legacy code relying on it,
right?
> GDB has a strong preference for flushing code it no longer needs.
> It has the unfortunate habbit of rearing its head at later
> inopportune moments.
Perhaps, but libiberty is used by more than just gdb, so I have to be
extra careful about backwards compatibility. Just yesterday someone
was asking about using libiberty in their own program.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext
2002-02-23 21:35 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2002-02-23 22:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 22:06 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-02-23 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DJ Delorie; +Cc: gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches
> The single format wasn't sufficient for a program trying to correctly
>> manipulate both big and little endian Arm floating points - hence the
>> two new formats.
>
>
> Is it safe to say that the code you're removing never actually worked,
> then? If so, then there shouldn't be any legacy code relying on it,
> right?
Er, actually, the code I ``fixed'' didn't use it either! The format was
added '95 but I've had no luck finding anything that used it.
enjoy,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext
2002-02-23 22:05 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-02-23 22:06 ` DJ Delorie
2002-03-05 22:31 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2002-02-23 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches
> Er, actually, the code I ``fixed'' didn't use it either! The format was
> added '95 but I've had no luck finding anything that used it.
Hrmph. Approved, then.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext
2002-02-23 22:06 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2002-03-05 22:31 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-03-05 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DJ Delorie; +Cc: gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches
> Er, actually, the code I ``fixed'' didn't use it either! The format was
>> added '95 but I've had no luck finding anything that used it.
>
>
> Hrmph. Approved, then.
>
Committed to trunk.
> Index: ./include/ChangeLog
> 2002-02-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * floatformat.h (floatformat_arm_ext): Delete declaration.
>
> Index: ./libiberty/ChangeLog
> 2002-02-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * floatformat.c (floatformat_arm_ext_big): Delete definition.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-06 6:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-23 19:57 [patch/rfc] Delete floatformat_arm_ext Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 20:47 ` DJ Delorie
2002-02-23 21:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 21:35 ` DJ Delorie
2002-02-23 22:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-23 22:06 ` DJ Delorie
2002-03-05 22:31 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox