Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Don't use thread_db on corefiles
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C1AB5EE.1000506@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011213232557.B20920@nevyn.them.org>

> Oh, is that what you were talking about?  Sorry, I must have been
>> confused.
>> 
>> So -- you are talking about building a single GDB that can debug
>> 1) native x86 linux, and
>> 2) MIPS multi-threaded linux corefiles.
>> 
>> Is that right?
> 
> 
> Well, that's not actually something I need to do, but I'd like it to be
> possible.  I only need for both native and cross-hosted debuggers to
> both be able to get at the core files.  But as things stand now, if we
> fix thread_db to be able to do so using lin-lwp, then the native and
> cross debuggers will get at the threads using completely different
> interfaces.  That worries me.


At a technical level, it would mean making the thread:lwp mapping 
library multi-arch.  I think Michael gave a good summary - that isn't a 
free lunch.  (1)

Returning to the problem at hand though,

If you build --target=mips-unknown-linux-gnu does the resultant GDB 
include the native thread-db code?  Surely it doesn't since, as you 
point out, it can't work.  For the moment, would only be able to display 
threads, just the raw LWPs.

Hmm, perhaps it is a native GDB looking at a threaded core file?  In 
that case, yes the thread-db should drop its self on top.  If that is 
causing an internal error then there is something messed up that should 
be fixed.

Andrew

(1) The unixware thread code is a prototype of this sort of thing.  I 
say prototype since it really needs a proper target stack.


  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-15  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-13  8:50 Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 10:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-13 11:37   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-16 17:58   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-16 21:32     ` Kevin Buettner
2001-12-17  8:34       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 12:26 ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-13 12:31   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 14:59     ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-13 15:04       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 15:08         ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-13 15:11           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 15:37             ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-13 15:46               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 17:14                 ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-13 20:29                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-14 18:12                     ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-14 18:25                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 15:47             ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-13 15:57               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 16:06                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 17:31                   ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-13 20:23                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-14 15:43                       ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-14 17:14                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-17 11:40                           ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-17 11:51                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-13 17:26                 ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-13 20:27                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-14 18:31                     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-12-14 18:36                       ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-14 18:42                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-15  9:16                         ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-16 12:26                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-16 13:29                             ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-16 17:02                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-03 17:11 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-04 10:25   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-04 14:49     ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-04 17:28     ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-04 17:47       ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C1AB5EE.1000506@cygnus.com \
    --to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox