Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp

Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:23:31 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> 
> The attatched patch addresses a DOS file name clash caused by all the 
> mi0-var-*.exp files I recently created.
> 
> Is this the correct way to do this?  The files aren't used in a DOS build.

Yes, this is the way.  However:

> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-cmd.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varcmd.exp
> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-child.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varchild.exp

These two still clash: truncation to 8+3 yields "mi0-varc.exp" for
both of them.

Actually, I wonder why do we have to keep those mi0- prefixes.  This
is all in gdb.mi subdirectory, so there should be no need to stress
the fact we are talking about mi.  If the zero is significant, we can
keep it, but "mi" can go, I think.

Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp

[Andrew Cagney]

> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:23:31 -0400
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
>> 
>> The attatched patch addresses a DOS file name clash caused by all the 
>> mi0-var-*.exp files I recently created.
>> 
>> Is this the correct way to do this?  The files aren't used in a DOS build.
> 
> 
> Yes, this is the way.  However:
> 
> 
>> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-cmd.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varcmd.exp
>> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-child.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varchild.exp
> 
> 
> These two still clash: truncation to 8+3 yields "mi0-varc.exp" for
> both of them.


Will fix.

Hmm, that would mean that mi-var-cmd.exp and mi-var-child.exp also 
clash.  Ah, yes found them hidden in fnchange.lst, would you object to 
me (separatly) sorting that file?


> Actually, I wonder why do we have to keep those mi0- prefixes.  This
> is all in gdb.mi subdirectory, so there should be no need to stress
> the fact we are talking about mi.  If the zero is significant, we can
> keep it, but "mi" can go, I think.


If my memory is correct, it is a namespace proof things.  While it looks 
like a two level structure dejagnu ignores this and just worries about 
the basename.  If I tell dejagnu to run the test ``var-cmd.exp'' I get 
all of them.

	Andrew

Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:45:37 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> 
> would you object to me (separatly) sorting that file?

No, please go ahead.

Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp

[Andrew Cagney]

> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:45:37 -0400
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
>> 
>> would you object to me (separatly) sorting that file?
> 
> 
> No, please go ahead.


Done. I'll omit the details of the file change.

	Andrew

Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp

[Fernando Nasser]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > Actually, I wonder why do we have to keep those mi0- prefixes.  This
> > is all in gdb.mi subdirectory, so there should be no need to stress
> > the fact we are talking about mi.  If the zero is significant, we can
> > keep it, but "mi" can go, I think.
> 
> If my memory is correct, it is a namespace proof things.  While it looks
> like a two level structure dejagnu ignores this and just worries about
> the basename.  If I tell dejagnu to run the test ``var-cmd.exp'' I get
> all of them.
> 

That is correct.

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9