From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fernando Nasser To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 13:52:00 -0000 Message-id: <3B4A1972.F74EA369@cygnus.com> References: <3B3B8433.7020300@cygnus.com> <3791-Fri29Jun2001102809+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3B3C9491.5020500@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00211.html Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Actually, I wonder why do we have to keep those mi0- prefixes. This > > is all in gdb.mi subdirectory, so there should be no need to stress > > the fact we are talking about mi. If the zero is significant, we can > > keep it, but "mi" can go, I think. > > If my memory is correct, it is a namespace proof things. While it looks > like a two level structure dejagnu ignores this and just worries about > the basename. If I tell dejagnu to run the test ``var-cmd.exp'' I get > all of them. > That is correct. -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9