Re: [RFA] enum enable

["Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>]

> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
> Date: 18 Jul 2001 12:16:47 -0500
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> > [Dig, dig] and it looks like this is expected: my references indicate
> > that enumeration constants and function names belong to the same
> > namespace in C programs.
> 
> Right.  The changes I asked about were all renamings of *structure*
> members, not enum members.

Sure, but it hardly made any sense to correct `enable' and `disable'
in some places, but not in others.  That would have raised a few
brows.

> I can go re-patch, recompile, and send you the error messages, but in
> order to correct your patch, you'll need to update your source tree
> anyway, right?

Hopefully, I won't, if the messages are self-explanatory ;-)

It's a terrible nuisance for me to fetch the monster distro and copy
all my local changes to it, that's why I try to avoid that.

So if you can afford it, please send me the messages.  Thanks.