From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [RFA] enum enable Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:59:00 -0000 Message-id: <3405-Wed18Jul2001225630+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <200107180700.KAA12466@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00452.html > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 18 Jul 2001 12:16:47 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > [Dig, dig] and it looks like this is expected: my references indicate > > that enumeration constants and function names belong to the same > > namespace in C programs. > > Right. The changes I asked about were all renamings of *structure* > members, not enum members. Sure, but it hardly made any sense to correct `enable' and `disable' in some places, but not in others. That would have raised a few brows. > I can go re-patch, recompile, and send you the error messages, but in > order to correct your patch, you'll need to update your source tree > anyway, right? Hopefully, I won't, if the messages are self-explanatory ;-) It's a terrible nuisance for me to fetch the monster distro and copy all my local changes to it, that's why I try to avoid that. So if you can afford it, please send me the messages. Thanks.