Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ob] Remove initializations of memset'd structure
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2914-Tue17Feb2004211147+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16434.9582.574401.561988@localhost.redhat.com> (message from Elena Zannoni on Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:30:06 -0500)

> From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:30:06 -0500
>  > >  
>  > > -    MSYMBOL_TYPE (m) = mst_unknown;
>  > 
>  > This part of the patch seems to assume that mst_unknown has the value
>  > zero.  Should we have such assumptions in the code?
> 
> Yes, in symtab.h mst_unknown is 0.

I know that, I looked it up in symtab.h.  The question is, should the
code rely on the fact that zeroing out the struct causes the
MSYMBOL_TYPE member to become mst_unknown.  Suppose we change the
enumeration some day, that would break the code.

So I think a comment is not enough, we should leave that line alone.
In general, it is my opinion that code should not assume anything
about the numerical values of enumerated types.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-17 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-16 21:15 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17  6:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-17 14:34   ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-17 19:12     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-02-17 19:37       ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-17 19:47         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 20:28           ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-17 20:44             ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2914-Tue17Feb2004211147+0200-eliz@elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@elta.co.il \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox