From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [commit] [testsuite patch] Fix gdb.btrace/tailcall-only.exp errors on x86_64-m32
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2234b2b7-47af-9887-ee70-495be177f038@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160720143844.GA14699@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On 07/20/2016 03:38 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:36:46 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Not sure this particular commit, but AFAIK, there's no target
>> triplet for x32, even.
>
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/x32
> ->
> x86_64-x32-linux
AFAICS, that "x32" is in the "vendor" part of the triplet, which should
never mean anything for the tools themselves, being a free field to use by
whoever builds the tools, in order to give the binaries a unique
file name (x86_64-x32-linux-gcc, etc.), and for branding, like
x86_64-redhat-linux-gcc. AFAICS, nothing in config.sub, and the
different configure scripts in binutils-gdb select on *-x32-*.
ISTR that a triplet like x86_64-*-linux-gnux32 or x86_64-*-linux-gnu-x32
was originally proposed, but then the toolchain ended using strictly
multilib flags to select/detect x32. But, actually, now that I grep, I find
a few hits on "x86_64-*-linux-gnux32", though not many, so it looks like
there's a triplet after all.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-20 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 15:53 Jan Kratochvil
2016-04-11 6:44 ` Metzger, Markus T
2016-04-11 19:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-20 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-20 14:22 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-20 14:26 ` Metzger, Markus T
2016-07-20 14:32 ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-20 14:36 ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-20 14:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-07-20 15:07 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-07-21 13:51 ` Metzger, Markus T
2016-07-21 14:00 ` Pedro Alves
2016-07-21 14:06 ` Metzger, Markus T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2234b2b7-47af-9887-ee70-495be177f038@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox