* [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/nostdlib.exp on aarch64
@ 2025-02-26 10:41 Tom de Vries
2025-02-27 19:38 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2025-02-26 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On aarch64-linux, in test-case gdb.base/nostdlib.exp I run into:
...
(gdb) continue^M
Continuing.^M
warning: Temporarily disabling breakpoints for unloaded shared library \
"/lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1"^M
^M
Breakpoint 2, _start () at nostdlib.c:20^M
20 {^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/nostdlib.exp: pie=pie: continue to marker
...
This happens as follows:
- the test-case sets a breakpoint on *_start,
- the breakpoint resolves to *_start in the executable,
- the executable is started, and the breakpoint resolves to *_start in the
dynamic linker,
- execution stops at *_start in the dynamic linker,
- the test-case issues a continue, expecting to continue to the breakpoint on
marker,
- while continuing, the dynamic linker is reported as unloaded,
- the breakpoint again resolves to *_start in the executable,
- execution stops at *_start in the executable, and
- the test-case concludes that it failed to "continue to marker".
This doesn't happen on x86_64-linux. There, after the executable is started,
the breakpoint again resolves to *_start in the exec.
This is similar to what happens when printing _start.
On aarch64-linux, we print the _start in the dynamic linker:
...
$ gdb -q -batch outputs/gdb.base/nostdlib/nostdlib-pie \
-ex "b _start" \
-ex run \
-ex "print _start" \
-ex "info break"
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2bc: file nostdlib.c, line 23.
Breakpoint 1.2, _start () at ../sysdeps/aarch64/dl-start.S:22
22 ENTRY (_start)
$1 = {void (void)} 0xfffff7fd6ac0 <_start>
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE>
breakpoint already hit 1 time
1.1 y 0x0000aaaaaaaa02bc in _start at nostdlib.c:23
1.2 y 0x0000fffff7fd6ac0 in _start at dl-start.S:22
...
On x86_64-linux, we print the _start in the exec:
...
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2c5: file nostdlib.c, line 23.
Breakpoint 1.2, 0x00007ffff7fe4f00 in _start () from \
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
$1 = {void (void)} 0x5555555542c1 <_start>
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE>
breakpoint already hit 1 time
1.1 y 0x00005555555542c5 in _start at nostdlib.c:23
1.2 y 0x00007ffff7fe4f00 <_start>
...
The difference may be down to the availability of debug info for the _start in
the dynamic linker.
Finally, the described scenarion on aarch64-linux is not deterministic. The
behaviour depends on the dynamic linker being reported as unloaded, which has
been classified as a GLIBC bug, so that might get fixed.
Ideally this test-case would stop at both *_start in the executable and the
dynamic linker, but in absense of a way to specify this reliably (see PR32748),
fix this by making this a temporary breakpoint, ensuring that the breakpoint
will only trigger once.
PR testsuite/32743
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32743
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp
index 7c32e87ebdb..be63d0871ef 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp
@@ -52,13 +52,33 @@ foreach_with_prefix pie { "nopie" "pie" } {
clean_restart $binfile
gdb_breakpoint "*marker"
- gdb_breakpoint "*_start"
+
+ # Say we set a permanent breakpoint on *_start. When setting the
+ # breakpoint, it will resolve to _start in the exec.
+ # After starting to run, that may stay the same, and consequently
+ # execution will stop there.
+ # OTOH, after starting to run, that may change to *_start in the dynamic
+ # linker, and consequently execution will stop there.
+ # There's currently no way to enforce one or the other (PR32748).
+ #
+ # Say we run into a stop in *_start in the dynamic linker. Continuing
+ # from this situation, the dynamic linker is reported as unloaded, which
+ # make the breakpoint resolve again to *_start in the exec, and
+ # consequently execution will stop there as well.
+ #
+ # However, we cannot rely on this behavior either. Reporting the dynamic
+ # linker as unloaded is a GLIBC bug, which may get fixed eventually.
+ #
+ # Instead of trying to cater for all these possibilities in a controlled
+ # fashion, make the breakpoint temporary, ensuring that there will just be
+ # one stop.
+ gdb_breakpoint "*_start" temporary
gdb_run_cmd
# Breakpoint 2, Stopped due to shared library event
# _start () at ./gdb.base/nostdlib.c:20
- gdb_test "" {Breakpoint [0-9]+, .*_start .*} "stop at run"
+ gdb_test "" {Temporary breakpoint [0-9]+, .*_start .*} "stop at run"
gdb_test "continue" {Breakpoint [0-9]+, marker .*} "continue to marker"
base-commit: 5e0032993ab22f52fc66a26260ce0b489c1976b3
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/nostdlib.exp on aarch64
2025-02-26 10:41 [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/nostdlib.exp on aarch64 Tom de Vries
@ 2025-02-27 19:38 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2025-02-27 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom de Vries; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:41:06 +0100
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> wrote:
> Ideally this test-case would stop at both *_start in the executable and the
> dynamic linker, but in absense of a way to specify this reliably (see PR32748),
> fix this by making this a temporary breakpoint, ensuring that the breakpoint
> will only trigger once.
I think that this is a reasonable solution.
Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-27 19:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-26 10:41 [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/nostdlib.exp on aarch64 Tom de Vries
2025-02-27 19:38 ` Kevin Buettner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox