From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/nostdlib.exp on aarch64
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:41:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226104106.6061-1-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
On aarch64-linux, in test-case gdb.base/nostdlib.exp I run into:
...
(gdb) continue^M
Continuing.^M
warning: Temporarily disabling breakpoints for unloaded shared library \
"/lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1"^M
^M
Breakpoint 2, _start () at nostdlib.c:20^M
20 {^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/nostdlib.exp: pie=pie: continue to marker
...
This happens as follows:
- the test-case sets a breakpoint on *_start,
- the breakpoint resolves to *_start in the executable,
- the executable is started, and the breakpoint resolves to *_start in the
dynamic linker,
- execution stops at *_start in the dynamic linker,
- the test-case issues a continue, expecting to continue to the breakpoint on
marker,
- while continuing, the dynamic linker is reported as unloaded,
- the breakpoint again resolves to *_start in the executable,
- execution stops at *_start in the executable, and
- the test-case concludes that it failed to "continue to marker".
This doesn't happen on x86_64-linux. There, after the executable is started,
the breakpoint again resolves to *_start in the exec.
This is similar to what happens when printing _start.
On aarch64-linux, we print the _start in the dynamic linker:
...
$ gdb -q -batch outputs/gdb.base/nostdlib/nostdlib-pie \
-ex "b _start" \
-ex run \
-ex "print _start" \
-ex "info break"
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2bc: file nostdlib.c, line 23.
Breakpoint 1.2, _start () at ../sysdeps/aarch64/dl-start.S:22
22 ENTRY (_start)
$1 = {void (void)} 0xfffff7fd6ac0 <_start>
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE>
breakpoint already hit 1 time
1.1 y 0x0000aaaaaaaa02bc in _start at nostdlib.c:23
1.2 y 0x0000fffff7fd6ac0 in _start at dl-start.S:22
...
On x86_64-linux, we print the _start in the exec:
...
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2c5: file nostdlib.c, line 23.
Breakpoint 1.2, 0x00007ffff7fe4f00 in _start () from \
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
$1 = {void (void)} 0x5555555542c1 <_start>
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE>
breakpoint already hit 1 time
1.1 y 0x00005555555542c5 in _start at nostdlib.c:23
1.2 y 0x00007ffff7fe4f00 <_start>
...
The difference may be down to the availability of debug info for the _start in
the dynamic linker.
Finally, the described scenarion on aarch64-linux is not deterministic. The
behaviour depends on the dynamic linker being reported as unloaded, which has
been classified as a GLIBC bug, so that might get fixed.
Ideally this test-case would stop at both *_start in the executable and the
dynamic linker, but in absense of a way to specify this reliably (see PR32748),
fix this by making this a temporary breakpoint, ensuring that the breakpoint
will only trigger once.
PR testsuite/32743
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32743
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp
index 7c32e87ebdb..be63d0871ef 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/nostdlib.exp
@@ -52,13 +52,33 @@ foreach_with_prefix pie { "nopie" "pie" } {
clean_restart $binfile
gdb_breakpoint "*marker"
- gdb_breakpoint "*_start"
+
+ # Say we set a permanent breakpoint on *_start. When setting the
+ # breakpoint, it will resolve to _start in the exec.
+ # After starting to run, that may stay the same, and consequently
+ # execution will stop there.
+ # OTOH, after starting to run, that may change to *_start in the dynamic
+ # linker, and consequently execution will stop there.
+ # There's currently no way to enforce one or the other (PR32748).
+ #
+ # Say we run into a stop in *_start in the dynamic linker. Continuing
+ # from this situation, the dynamic linker is reported as unloaded, which
+ # make the breakpoint resolve again to *_start in the exec, and
+ # consequently execution will stop there as well.
+ #
+ # However, we cannot rely on this behavior either. Reporting the dynamic
+ # linker as unloaded is a GLIBC bug, which may get fixed eventually.
+ #
+ # Instead of trying to cater for all these possibilities in a controlled
+ # fashion, make the breakpoint temporary, ensuring that there will just be
+ # one stop.
+ gdb_breakpoint "*_start" temporary
gdb_run_cmd
# Breakpoint 2, Stopped due to shared library event
# _start () at ./gdb.base/nostdlib.c:20
- gdb_test "" {Breakpoint [0-9]+, .*_start .*} "stop at run"
+ gdb_test "" {Temporary breakpoint [0-9]+, .*_start .*} "stop at run"
gdb_test "continue" {Breakpoint [0-9]+, marker .*} "continue to marker"
base-commit: 5e0032993ab22f52fc66a26260ce0b489c1976b3
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 10:41 Tom de Vries [this message]
2025-02-27 19:38 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250226104106.6061-1-tdevries@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox