From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] gdb: pass inferior to get_linux_inferior_data
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:46:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110214614.2842615-8-simon.marchi@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110214614.2842615-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Pass to get_linux_inferior_data the inferior for which we want to obtain
the linux-specific data, rather than assuming the current inferior.
This helps slightly reduce the diff in the upcoming main patch.
Update the sole caller to pass the current inferior.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* linux-tdep.c (get_linux_inferior_data): Add inferior
parameter.
(linux_vsyscall_range): Pass current inferior.
Change-Id: Ie4b61190e4a2e89b5b55a140cfecd4de66d92393
---
gdb/linux-tdep.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/linux-tdep.c b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
index bacb61398fa..c57181765e0 100644
--- a/gdb/linux-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
@@ -217,13 +217,11 @@ invalidate_linux_cache_inf (struct inferior *inf)
valid INFO pointer. */
static struct linux_info *
-get_linux_inferior_data (void)
+get_linux_inferior_data (inferior *inf)
{
- struct linux_info *info;
- struct inferior *inf = current_inferior ();
+ linux_info *info = linux_inferior_data.get (inf);
- info = linux_inferior_data.get (inf);
- if (info == NULL)
+ if (info == nullptr)
info = linux_inferior_data.emplace (inf);
return info;
@@ -2408,7 +2406,7 @@ linux_vsyscall_range_raw (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct mem_range *range)
static int
linux_vsyscall_range (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct mem_range *range)
{
- struct linux_info *info = get_linux_inferior_data ();
+ struct linux_info *info = get_linux_inferior_data (current_inferior ());
if (info->vsyscall_range_p == 0)
{
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 21:46 [PATCH 00/12] Concurrent displaced stepping Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 01/12] gdb: add inferior_execd observable Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:28 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 02/12] gdb: clear inferior displaced stepping state on exec Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:28 ` Pedro Alves
2020-12-01 4:27 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 03/12] gdb: rename things related to step over chains Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:28 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-25 13:16 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 04/12] gdb: rename displaced_step_closure to displaced_step_copy_insn_closure Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:29 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 05/12] gdb: rename displaced_step_fixup to displaced_step_finish Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:29 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 06/12] gdb: introduce status enum for displaced step prepare/finish Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-11 23:36 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-11-25 13:17 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:30 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-25 13:20 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-10 21:46 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2020-11-25 1:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] gdb: pass inferior to get_linux_inferior_data Pedro Alves
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 08/12] gdb: move displaced stepping types to displaced-stepping.{h, c} Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:30 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 09/12] gdb: move displaced stepping logic to gdbarch, allow starting concurrent displaced steps Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:40 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-25 19:29 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 19:35 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-26 14:25 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-30 19:13 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-26 14:24 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-30 20:26 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 10/12] gdb: change linux gdbarch data from post to pre-init Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:41 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 11/12] gdb: make displaced stepping implementation capable of managing multiple buffers Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:41 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-30 18:58 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-30 19:01 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-10 21:46 ` [PATCH 12/12] gdb: use two displaced step buffers on amd64/Linux Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-25 1:42 ` Pedro Alves
2020-11-25 6:26 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-25 20:07 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-25 20:56 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-26 21:43 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-26 22:34 ` Simon Marchi
2020-11-28 18:56 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201110214614.2842615-8-simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox