* [PUSHED/OBVIOUS] Don't duplicate comment in symfile.c and .h
@ 2019-09-17 3:10 Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches @ 2019-09-17 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Christian Biesinger
This just replaces the comment in the .c file with
"See symfile.h.".
gdb/ChangeLog:
2019-09-16 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
* symfile.c (auto_solib_add): Replace comment with a reference
to the header file.
---
gdb/symfile.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/symfile.c b/gdb/symfile.c
index 3cd514409b..259a30aa04 100644
--- a/gdb/symfile.c
+++ b/gdb/symfile.c
@@ -141,15 +141,7 @@ static const char *print_symbol_loading_enums[] =
};
static const char *print_symbol_loading = print_symbol_loading_full;
-/* If non-zero, shared library symbols will be added automatically
- when the inferior is created, new libraries are loaded, or when
- attaching to the inferior. This is almost always what users will
- want to have happen; but for very large programs, the startup time
- will be excessive, and so if this is a problem, the user can clear
- this flag and then add the shared library symbols as needed. Note
- that there is a potential for confusion, since if the shared
- library symbols are not loaded, commands like "info fun" will *not*
- report all the functions that are actually present. */
+/* See symfile.h. */
int auto_solib_add = 1;
\f
--
2.23.0.237.gc6a4ce50a0-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] Replace solib_global_lookup with gdbarch_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order
@ 2019-09-20 2:57 Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-20 2:57 ` [PUSHED/OBVIOUS] Don't duplicate comment in symfile.c and .h Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches @ 2019-09-20 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Marchi; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:00 AM Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> wrote:
>
> On 2019-08-27 7:03 p.m., Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches wrote:
> > [Test solib-corrupted.exp is now fixed]
> >
> > All implementations of either function use it for the same purpose (except
> > Darwin, which is a no-op): to prefer a symbol in the current objfile over
> > symbols with the same name in other objfiles. There does not seem to be a
> > reason to have both mechanisms for that purpose.
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> The patch LGTM, I'm also confident that it doesn't change the current
> behavior. I just have two very minor comments below.
>
> Note that SPU support is about to be removed [1]. If you wait until it is
> removed, it would simplify a bit this patch, as you wish.
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00067.html
Will do.
> > @@ -3202,32 +3204,41 @@ svr4_lp64_fetch_link_map_offsets (void)
> >
> > struct target_so_ops svr4_so_ops;
> >
> > -/* Lookup global symbol for ELF DSOs linked with -Bsymbolic. Those DSOs have a
> > +/* Search order for ELF DSOs linked with -Bsymbolic. Those DSOs have a
> > different rule for symbol lookup. The lookup begins here in the DSO, not in
> > the main executable. */
> >
> > -static struct block_symbol
> > -elf_lookup_lib_symbol (struct objfile *objfile,
> > - const char *name,
> > - const domain_enum domain)
> > +void
> > +svr4_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order
> > + (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> > + iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order_cb_ftype *cb,
> > + void *cb_data, struct objfile *current_objfile)
> > {
> > - bfd *abfd;
> > -
> > - if (objfile == symfile_objfile)
> > - abfd = exec_bfd;
> > - else
> > + if (current_objfile != nullptr)
> > {
> > - /* OBJFILE should have been passed as the non-debug one. */
> > - gdb_assert (objfile->separate_debug_objfile_backlink == NULL);
> > + bfd *abfd;
> >
> > - abfd = objfile->obfd;
> > - }
> > + if (current_objfile->separate_debug_objfile_backlink != nullptr)
> > + current_objfile = current_objfile->separate_debug_objfile_backlink;
> >
> > - if (abfd == NULL || scan_dyntag (DT_SYMBOLIC, abfd, NULL, NULL) != 1)
> > - return {};
> > + if (current_objfile == symfile_objfile)
> > + abfd = exec_bfd;
> > + else
> > + abfd = current_objfile->obfd;
> > +
> > + if (abfd != nullptr &&
> > + scan_dyntag (DT_SYMBOLIC, abfd, nullptr, nullptr) == 1)
> > + {
> > + if (cb (current_objfile, cb_data) != 0)
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > - return lookup_global_symbol_from_objfile (objfile, GLOBAL_BLOCK, name,
> > - domain);
> > + for (objfile *objfile : current_program_space->objfiles ())
> > + {
> > + if (cb (objfile, cb_data) != 0)
> > + return;
> > + }
> > }
>
> If we do search the current objfile in the first part of that
> function, we could skip it in the second part.
Done.
> > diff --git a/gdb/solib-svr4.h b/gdb/solib-svr4.h
> > index a051e70b79..b99b8e2e3a 100644
> > --- a/gdb/solib-svr4.h
> > +++ b/gdb/solib-svr4.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #define SOLIB_SVR4_H
> >
> > #include "solist.h"
> > +#include "gdbarch.h"
>
> Could this be a forward declaration of `struct gdbarch` instead?
>
> Though if you wait until SPU is removed, the function
> svr4_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order won't need to be exported, it should
> be made static.
Done (made static).
Will send a new version of the patch and push when SPU is removed.
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PUSHED/OBVIOUS] Don't duplicate comment in symfile.c and .h
2019-09-20 2:57 [PATCH v3] Replace solib_global_lookup with gdbarch_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
@ 2019-09-20 2:57 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-20 2:59 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches @ 2019-09-20 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Christian Biesinger
This just replaces the comment in the .c file with
"See symfile.h.".
gdb/ChangeLog:
2019-09-16 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
* symfile.c (auto_solib_add): Replace comment with a reference
to the header file.
---
gdb/symfile.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/symfile.c b/gdb/symfile.c
index 3cd514409b..259a30aa04 100644
--- a/gdb/symfile.c
+++ b/gdb/symfile.c
@@ -141,15 +141,7 @@ static const char *print_symbol_loading_enums[] =
};
static const char *print_symbol_loading = print_symbol_loading_full;
-/* If non-zero, shared library symbols will be added automatically
- when the inferior is created, new libraries are loaded, or when
- attaching to the inferior. This is almost always what users will
- want to have happen; but for very large programs, the startup time
- will be excessive, and so if this is a problem, the user can clear
- this flag and then add the shared library symbols as needed. Note
- that there is a potential for confusion, since if the shared
- library symbols are not loaded, commands like "info fun" will *not*
- report all the functions that are actually present. */
+/* See symfile.h. */
int auto_solib_add = 1;
\f
--
2.23.0.237.gc6a4ce50a0-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PUSHED/OBVIOUS] Don't duplicate comment in symfile.c and .h
2019-09-20 2:57 ` [PUSHED/OBVIOUS] Don't duplicate comment in symfile.c and .h Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
@ 2019-09-20 2:59 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches @ 2019-09-20 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
argh, accidentally sent the wrong file. please disregard (this is a duplicate)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:57 AM Christian Biesinger
<cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:
>
> This just replaces the comment in the .c file with
> "See symfile.h.".
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-09-16 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
>
> * symfile.c (auto_solib_add): Replace comment with a reference
> to the header file.
> ---
> gdb/symfile.c | 10 +---------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/symfile.c b/gdb/symfile.c
> index 3cd514409b..259a30aa04 100644
> --- a/gdb/symfile.c
> +++ b/gdb/symfile.c
> @@ -141,15 +141,7 @@ static const char *print_symbol_loading_enums[] =
> };
> static const char *print_symbol_loading = print_symbol_loading_full;
>
> -/* If non-zero, shared library symbols will be added automatically
> - when the inferior is created, new libraries are loaded, or when
> - attaching to the inferior. This is almost always what users will
> - want to have happen; but for very large programs, the startup time
> - will be excessive, and so if this is a problem, the user can clear
> - this flag and then add the shared library symbols as needed. Note
> - that there is a potential for confusion, since if the shared
> - library symbols are not loaded, commands like "info fun" will *not*
> - report all the functions that are actually present. */
> +/* See symfile.h. */
>
> int auto_solib_add = 1;
>
> --
> 2.23.0.237.gc6a4ce50a0-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-20 2:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-17 3:10 [PUSHED/OBVIOUS] Don't duplicate comment in symfile.c and .h Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-20 2:57 [PATCH v3] Replace solib_global_lookup with gdbarch_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-20 2:57 ` [PUSHED/OBVIOUS] Don't duplicate comment in symfile.c and .h Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-20 2:59 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox