Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix amd64->i386 linux syscall restart problem

[Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:34:46 +0200
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> wrote:

> On 21-05-19 14:59, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 11-04-19 02:16, Kevin Buettner wrote:  
> >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:42:30 +0100
> >> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>  
> >>>> Below is a diff showing the new comments.  It also includes the
> >>>> changes which wrap the multi-line expressions in parens.    
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, that new version of the comment looks great.  
> >>
> >> It's in now.  Thanks for the review.  
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the tests fixed by this commit fail on the 8.3 branch (filed as PR24592).
> > 
> > The commit applies cleanly on the 8.3 branch, and make the tests pass.
> > 
> > OK to backport?  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> [ Ping. ]
> 
> I'm probably missing some context here. It seems sofar there are no
> commits to the 8.3 branch. AFAIU, a respin release 8.3.1 is targeted for
> 3 months after 8.3, so around 11th of August.
> 
> What kind of fixes are acceptable for the respin? Do they have to be
> regression fixes? Or are functionality fixes like this one also allowed?
> Who's responsibility is it to backport fixes?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Tom

I'm okay with it going into the next point release for 8.3.

Kevin