From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 128721 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2019 17:00:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127475 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2019 17:00:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=whos, who's, responsibility, apr X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:00:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD907EBC1; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f29-4.lan (ovpn-117-224.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.117.224]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DDA82B9CF; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:00:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: Tom de Vries Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix amd64->i386 linux syscall restart problem Message-ID: <20190708100001.6f2bc0fc@f29-4.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20190316221341.021f7c62@f29-4.lan> <975e7120-1b61-2807-5aab-b961e07a80d0@redhat.com> <20190409192916.79fcb539@f29-4.lan> <20190410171606.0e736077@f29-4.lan> <40eb20c2-f6d0-eb16-d6fe-c717138b6559@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:34:46 +0200 Tom de Vries wrote: > On 21-05-19 14:59, Tom de Vries wrote: > > On 11-04-19 02:16, Kevin Buettner wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:42:30 +0100 > >> Pedro Alves wrote: > >> > >>>> Below is a diff showing the new comments. It also includes the > >>>> changes which wrap the multi-line expressions in parens. > >>> > >>> Thanks, that new version of the comment looks great. > >> > >> It's in now. Thanks for the review. > > > > Hi, > > > > the tests fixed by this commit fail on the 8.3 branch (filed as PR24592). > > > > The commit applies cleanly on the 8.3 branch, and make the tests pass. > > > > OK to backport? > > Hi, > > [ Ping. ] > > I'm probably missing some context here. It seems sofar there are no > commits to the 8.3 branch. AFAIU, a respin release 8.3.1 is targeted for > 3 months after 8.3, so around 11th of August. > > What kind of fixes are acceptable for the respin? Do they have to be > regression fixes? Or are functionality fixes like this one also allowed? > Who's responsibility is it to backport fixes? > > Thanks, > - Tom I'm okay with it going into the next point release for 8.3. Kevin