From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
Subject: Re: The 'cold' function attribute and GDB
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 07:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502003849.6759d177@f29-4.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A55D98D9-5801-42BB-9E12-060D4398ACC7@gnu.org>
On Thu, 02 May 2019 10:05:41 +0300
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> On May 2, 2019 5:51:13 AM GMT+03:00, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 May 2019 16:17:04 -0400
> > Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > In an ideal world, if gcc generates two separate ranges
> > > of instruction for this function (the hot path and the cold path),
> > it should describe
> > > it as two ranges in the entry for print_vectorlike. If so, it
> > should be described with
> > > a DW_AT_ranges attribute.
> >
> > Yes, this is exactly right.
>
>
> I do see in the DWARF info that print_vectorlike has 2 address ranges: its DW_AT_ranges attribute specifies a value which is shown as a list of 2 ranges in the "objdump -WR" output.
>
> So where do I go from here? What to check next?
Can you show me what is printed for the following commands?
disassemble print_vectorlike
x/3i print_vectorlike
b print_vectorlike
For the disassemble command, I expect both ranges to be displayed.
The x and b commands should print insns / set a breakpoint on the entry
pc (which should NOT be the cold address) of the function. If one or more
of these things aren't happening, then something is going wrong
somewhere.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-01 18:59 Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-01 20:17 ` Simon Marchi
2019-05-02 2:51 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 6:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 7:26 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 15:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 15:59 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 16:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 18:08 ` Simon Marchi
2019-05-02 18:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 18:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 19:51 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 7:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 7:38 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2019-05-02 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 15:56 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 16:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 18:25 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 18:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 19:13 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 19:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 19:45 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 19:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-02 23:30 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-04 8:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-05 20:04 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-06 15:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-06 16:24 ` Kevin Buettner
2019-05-02 15:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190502003849.6759d177@f29-4.lan \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox