From: "André Pönitz" <apoenitz@t-online.de>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use -qualified flag when setting temporary breakpoint in start command
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 18:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409171256.GA5702@klara.mpi.htwm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190409025557.28846-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:55:57PM -0400, Simon Marchi wrote:
> From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
>
> When using the "start" command, GDB puts a temporary breakpoint on the
> "main" symbol (we literally invoke the tbreak command). However, since
> it does wild matching by default, it also puts a breakpoint on any C++
> method or "main" function in a namespace. For example, when debugging
> GDB, it creates a total of 24 locations:
I wonder whether there's still a chance to have a(n additional) way
to specify the effect of -qualified using a syntax that is the same
across GDB versions.
I have pretty much the same effect like Simon for 'start' for a feature
'Break on abort()' in 'my' IDE, that post-8.1 triggers on any function
called 'abort'.
Even with the Python interface there seems to be no way to have
a single way to set the breakpoint short of having Pre/Post81Breakpoint
classes using different base constructors and try:/except...:
to find the matching version.
To be honest, I am tempted to call the whole pattern matching on
function names a mis-feature. C++ name resolution is not really
compatible with regexps, so at the very least when naming the
global explicitly ('b ::abort') there should be no match on
'struct Foo { void abort() {} };'
Andre'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 2:56 Simon Marchi
2019-04-09 15:27 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-09 16:19 ` Simon Marchi
2019-04-09 16:30 ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-09 16:37 ` Simon Marchi
2019-04-09 18:09 ` André Pönitz [this message]
2019-04-09 22:02 ` [PP?] " Simon Marchi
2019-04-10 18:22 ` André Pönitz
2019-04-25 14:10 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <96f5e735-0cdd-8bcb-58cf-e3986a5e3d5d@efficios.com>
2019-04-25 15:52 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190409171256.GA5702@klara.mpi.htwm.de \
--to=apoenitz@t-online.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox