From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: sangamesh.swamy@in.ibm.com (Sangamesh Mallayya)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: set sysroot command on AIX has no effect.
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161008143755.10ABE10BEE3@oc8523832656.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF848F0736.112F16BD-ON65258046.00477D54-65258046.0048C0EC@notes.na.collabserv.com> from "Sangamesh Mallayya" at Oct 08, 2016 06:44:40 PM
Sangamesh Mallayya wrote:
>> Well, of course, you have to check for NULL. What I'm suggesting is to
>> use something along the lines of:
>>
>> found_pathname = solib_find (filename, &found_file);
>> if (found_pathname == NULL)
>> // error handling
>> archive_bfd = solib_bfd_fopen (found_pathname, found_file);
>
>Yes, i did try these steps. But this won't set the sysroot path as we
>intend to.
>The final object filename we want is the one returned from solib_find,
>which is a sysroot prefixed pathname.
>After solib_bfd_fopen call we can't refer to found_pathname as it's been
>freed in solib_bfd_fopen at the end, and assertion failure later.
Well, if you want to reuse the found_pathname, you'll just have to
duplicate it (there's already a call to xstrdup later in the function,
you may have to move it earlier).
>> > + pathname = solib_find (filename, &found_file);
>> > + if (pathname == NULL)
>> > + perror_with_name (filename);
>> > archive_bfd = gdb_bfd_open (filename, gnutarget, -1);
>> > if (archive_bfd == NULL)
>> > {
>>
>> This has a number of problems:
>> - you still use gdb_bfd_open with filename, which means it still won't
>> find the file (I assume you meant to use pathname?)
>
>pathname we get is something like "/usr/lib/libc.a(shr.o)", Offcourse
>their is no such file with this pathname in the system.
>So we set a filename as "/usr/lib/libc.a" after separating member name
>from actual file and gdb_bfd_open does find the file and return it's bfd.
>Here if we pass the path returned from solib_find to gdb_bfd_open instead
>of filename then no issue is seen.
My point was, the code as shown above does *not* pass the path returned
from solib_find to gdb_bfd_open! The path returned from solib_find is
assigned to "pathname" (overriding the value pathname that was input to
the function), but then gdb_bfd_open is still called with "filename".
>I think, better we use found_pathname variable to store returned value
>from solib_find instead of using existing pathname variable to avoid
>confusion.
>And may assign object filename as "object_bfd->filename = xstrdup
>(found_pathname);" ?
Agreed (see above). However, note that this will *not* contain the
object name in parentheses. For example, if you initially get a
pathname of:
/usr/lib/libc.a(shr.o)
Then you separate out the filename into:
/usr/lib/libc.a
Then you pass this to solib_find and get a full name including sysroot:
/path/to/sysroot/usr/lib/libc.a
But what you probably want to use as name in the final solib object is:
/path/to/sysroot/usr/lib/libc.a(shr.o)
My point was that in order to get this, you'll have to append the
"(shr.o)" back on to the result you got from solib_find.
>The only problem i think if we use solib_find without using
>solib_bfd_fopen is found_file descriptor.
>Let me know your view.
Please do use the pair of solib_find / solib_bfd_fopen; they were
designed to be used with each other, that's why they have the
interface they do.
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-08 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-13 9:05 Sangamesh Mallayya
2016-09-29 15:33 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-09-30 14:15 ` Sangamesh Mallayya
2016-09-30 14:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-04 13:19 ` Sangamesh Mallayya
2016-10-07 19:31 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-08 13:15 ` Sangamesh Mallayya
2016-10-08 14:38 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2016-10-10 12:11 ` Sangamesh Mallayya
2016-10-10 16:29 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-11 7:17 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-13 13:42 ` Sangamesh Mallayya
2016-10-13 14:03 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-13 17:44 ` Sangamesh Mallayya
2016-10-14 13:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
[not found] <OFBAE0EEF6.511F8BA2-ON6525802D.00305F69-6525802D.0031DA2D@LocalDomain>
2016-09-27 11:39 ` Sangamesh Mallayya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161008143755.10ABE10BEE3@oc8523832656.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sangamesh.swamy@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox