From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: sandra@codesourcery.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GCC switch to C11 causes many testsuite compiler diagnostics
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 17:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201410251728.s9PHSg6v018247@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544BD7E6.1050602@codesourcery.com> (message from Sandra Loosemore on Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:03:34 -0600)
> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:03:34 -0600
> From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
>
> Comparing my latest nios2 test results (with Pedro's thread patch) with
> those from a checkout a couple weeks old, I noticed I had some new
> ERRORs due to apparent compilation failures. I tracked this down to the
> recent change on GCC mainline (r216247) to make the default C dialect
> GNU11, which enables -Wimplicit-int and -Wimplicit-function-declaration
> by default. I started working on a patch to fix the offending
> testcases, but realized that there are hundreds of them. :-(
>
> So, before I invest a lot more time on this, is updating the GDB
> testsuite to use a more modern C dialect the Right Thing To Do? I'm
> also wondering if it's really necessary to support compilers that can't
> handle function prototypes in the testsuite (not defining PROTOTYPES
> seems to be the default, in fact).
We've quite deliberately kept around a variety of C dialects and
coding styles to make sure GDB works with whatever style people use.
Having the majority of the tests use K&R style function declarations
is probably not so useful anymore. But there are some tests that
deliberately use K&_R style code to test whether GDB handles them
properly. So blind conversion is probably not a good idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-25 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-25 17:04 Sandra Loosemore
2014-10-25 17:28 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2014-10-30 16:23 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-31 19:02 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-31 19:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-10-31 19:29 ` Doug Evans
2014-11-03 11:02 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-30 16:07 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-30 22:26 ` Stan Shebs
2014-10-30 22:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-11-23 7:27 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201410251728.s9PHSg6v018247@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox