Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: sandra@codesourcery.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GCC switch to C11 causes many testsuite compiler diagnostics
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 17:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201410251728.s9PHSg6v018247@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544BD7E6.1050602@codesourcery.com> (message from Sandra	Loosemore on Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:03:34 -0600)

> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:03:34 -0600
> From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
> 
> Comparing my latest nios2 test results (with Pedro's thread patch) with 
> those from a checkout a couple weeks old, I noticed I had some new 
> ERRORs due to apparent compilation failures.  I tracked this down to the 
> recent change on GCC mainline (r216247) to make the default C dialect 
> GNU11, which enables -Wimplicit-int and -Wimplicit-function-declaration 
> by default.  I started working on a patch to fix the offending 
> testcases, but realized that there are hundreds of them.  :-(
> 
> So, before I invest a lot more time on this, is updating the GDB 
> testsuite to use a more modern C dialect the Right Thing To Do?  I'm 
> also wondering if it's really necessary to support compilers that can't 
> handle function prototypes in the testsuite (not defining PROTOTYPES 
> seems to be the default, in fact).

We've quite deliberately kept around a variety of C dialects and
coding styles to make sure GDB works with whatever style people use.
Having the majority of the tests use K&R style function declarations
is probably not so useful anymore.  But there are some tests that
deliberately use K&_R style code to test whether GDB handles them
properly.  So blind conversion is probably not a good idea.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-25 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-25 17:04 Sandra Loosemore
2014-10-25 17:28 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2014-10-30 16:23   ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-31 19:02     ` Doug Evans
2014-10-31 19:23       ` Mark Kettenis
2014-10-31 19:29         ` Doug Evans
2014-11-03 11:02         ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-30 16:07 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-30 22:26   ` Stan Shebs
2014-10-30 22:37     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-11-23  7:27 ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201410251728.s9PHSg6v018247@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox