From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: GCC switch to C11 causes many testsuite compiler diagnostics
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mula6db.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544BD7E6.1050602@codesourcery.com> (Sandra Loosemore's message of "Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:03:34 -0600")
On Sat, Oct 25 2014, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Comparing my latest nios2 test results (with Pedro's thread patch)
> with those from a checkout a couple weeks old, I noticed I had some
> new ERRORs due to apparent compilation failures. I tracked this down
> to the recent change on GCC mainline (r216247) to make the default C
> dialect GNU11, which enables -Wimplicit-int and
> -Wimplicit-function-declaration by default. I started working on a
> patch to fix the offending testcases, but realized that there are
> hundreds of them. :-(
The warnings appear in our S390 testing as well, so I've been working on
a fix already, as announced here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2014-q4/msg00037.html
In the meantime I've completed a patch set; maybe you'd like to check
that it does fix the warnings on NIOS2:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-10/msg00802.html
>
> So, before I invest a lot more time on this, is updating the GDB
> testsuite to use a more modern C dialect the Right Thing To Do? I'm
> also wondering if it's really necessary to support compilers that
> can't handle function prototypes in the testsuite (not defining
> PROTOTYPES seems to be the default, in fact).
AFAIK there's no need to support pre-C89 compilers that can't handle
function prototypes. GDB itself can't be compiled with such a compiler,
and many GDB test cases wouldn't work either.
--
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-25 17:04 Sandra Loosemore
2014-10-25 17:28 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-10-30 16:23 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-31 19:02 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-31 19:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-10-31 19:29 ` Doug Evans
2014-11-03 11:02 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-10-30 16:07 ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2014-10-30 22:26 ` Stan Shebs
2014-10-30 22:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-11-23 7:27 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874mula6db.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com \
--to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox