Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker)
Cc: palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves),
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org (GDB Patches)
Subject: Re: New deprecation procedure
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201409120851.s8C8pLtW027222@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140911190348.GA30710@adacore.com> from "Joel Brobecker" at Sep 11, 2014 12:03:48 PM

Joel Brobecker wrote:

> Sharing a thought that crossed my mind: I thought about increasing
> the amount of time we wait between steps, from 1 week to say, 2 weeks,
> giving anyone about a month to step up. I eventually dropped the idea
> because someone stepping up late should easily be able to revert
> the removal, particularly now that we've switched to git. In the
> meantime, since we suspect no-one is usually going to step up,
> waiting longer just defers the corresponding cleanups we want to do.
> If you guys agree with that, I'll add something to the wiki page
> to explain the thought process.

Makes sense to me.

Thanks,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-12  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-08 17:46 eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left Pedro Alves
2014-09-08 19:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-08 21:34   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-08 22:50     ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-09  0:25       ` Peter Schauer
2014-09-09  0:16     ` Peter Schauer
2014-09-09 11:39       ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-09-09 12:38         ` Peter Schauer
2014-09-09 21:25           ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-09-10 12:21             ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 13:15               ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-09-10 15:22                 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-09 21:48   ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-09-10 12:29     ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 14:45       ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-09-10 15:21         ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-10 15:50           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-09-10 16:12             ` [IRIX] eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint uses Pedro Alves
2014-09-10 22:44               ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 23:02                 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-11  3:27                   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-12 19:34                     ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-12 20:23                       ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 15:50           ` eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 16:00             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-09-10 16:36             ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-09-10 18:59               ` New deprecation procedure Pedro Alves
2014-09-11 19:03                 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-12  8:51                   ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2014-10-07  0:25         ` eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left Stan Shebs
2014-09-09 17:33 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201409120851.s8C8pLtW027222@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox