From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 v2] Refactor shared code in {i386,amd64}-linux-nat.c
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140711112818.GA1930@blade.nx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BD40E6.8000701@redhat.com>
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 03:12 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
> > This series is an updated version of the series I posted this
> > morning. Mark Kettenis rightly pointed out that
> > x86_linux_read_description was a mess of #ifdef spaghetti so
> > I have rewritten it.
> >
> > Patch 2 has changed because that's where the
> > x86_linux_read_description merge is. Patch 6 has changed because
> > that's where the code is pulled from {i386,amd64}-linux-nat.c into
> > x86-linux-nat.c. The remaining patches are the same.
> >
> > I've inlined the original description of the series below.
> >
> > Is this ok to commit?
>
> I read this, and apart from a couple nits, it all looked good to me.
>
> I think we can take Mark's silence as meaning his objections have
> been addressed, but in case he just didn't have time to reply, let's
> wait till Friday, and then push this in.
Pushed with the changes you suggested.
Thanks,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 14:12 Gary Benson
2014-06-27 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/7 v2] Merge {i386,amd64}_linux_read_description Gary Benson
2014-07-09 13:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-27 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/7 v2] Rename identical functions Gary Benson
2014-07-09 13:04 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-27 14:12 ` [PATCH 3/7 v2] Merge ps_get_thread_area Gary Benson
2014-07-09 13:08 ` Pedro Alves
2014-07-09 13:08 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-27 14:28 ` [PATCH 6/7 v2] Move duplicated code into new files Gary Benson
2014-07-09 13:12 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-27 14:40 ` [PATCH 5/7 v2] Comment and whitespace changes Gary Benson
2014-07-09 13:11 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-27 14:52 ` [PATCH 7/7 v2] Tidy #include lists Gary Benson
2014-07-09 13:13 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-06 9:36 ` Yao Qi
2014-08-06 10:19 ` Gary Benson
2014-08-06 11:16 ` Yao Qi
2014-09-09 15:09 ` [pushed] Fix missing "struct iovec" definition on some x86-linux. (was: "[PATCH 7/7 v2] Tidy #include lists") Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 10:59 ` Gary Benson
2014-09-10 13:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-27 14:53 ` [PATCH 4/7 v2] Pull out common parts of _initialize_{i386,amd64}_linux_nat Gary Benson
2014-07-09 13:09 ` Pedro Alves
2014-07-09 13:17 ` [PATCH 0/7 v2] Refactor shared code in {i386,amd64}-linux-nat.c Pedro Alves
2014-07-11 12:34 ` Gary Benson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140711112818.GA1930@blade.nx \
--to=gbenson@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox