From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: aburgess@broadcom.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consistent display of "<optimized out>"
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201308061318.r76DIMdd016369@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5200F55E.2050308@broadcom.com> (aburgess@broadcom.com)
> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:08:46 +0100
> From: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
>
> In some cases we report optimized out registers as "*value not available*"
> rather than "<optimized out>", the patch below makes this more consistent
> in the case I've spotted.
>
> Here's an example:
>
> (gdb) up
> #1 0x0000000000400800 in first_frame () at dw2-reg-undefined.c:27
> 27 in dw2-reg-undefined.c
> (gdb) info registers rax
> rax *value not available*
> (gdb) p/x $rax
> $1 = <optimized out>
>
> After the patch the behaviour is now:
>
> (gdb) up
> #1 0x0000000000400800 in first_frame () at dw2-reg-undefined.c:27
> 27 in dw2-reg-undefined.c
> (gdb) info registers rax
> rax <optimized out>
> (gdb) p/x $rax
> $1 = <optimized out>
>
> The behaviour for values that are unavailable is currently unchanged,
> though I have a follow up patch for this too.
>
> OK to apply?
I'd say no. There is a difference between "unavailable" and
"optimized out". Registers will be unavailable even if you compile
without any optimization, because the ABI specifies that their
contents are not saved across function calls. So "optimized out"
makes very little sense for registers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-06 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 13:09 Andrew Burgess
2013-08-06 13:18 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2013-08-06 13:49 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-08-06 15:41 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-08-06 16:02 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-08-06 18:39 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-12 13:32 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-08-12 13:55 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-12 14:01 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-08-12 20:01 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-08-13 8:27 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-08-16 18:41 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 20:28 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-19 10:25 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-09-05 16:29 ` [PATCH] Print registers not saved in the frame as "<not saved>", instead of "<optimized out>". (was: Re: [PATCH] Consistent display of "<optimized out>") Pedro Alves
2013-09-05 16:35 ` [PATCH] Print registers not saved in the frame as "<not saved>", instead of "<optimized out>" Andrew Burgess
2013-09-16 19:05 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-18 14:04 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-09-18 15:54 ` [PATCH+DOC] " Pedro Alves
2013-09-18 16:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-09-18 17:35 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-18 19:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-09-18 20:47 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-09-19 7:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-09-19 16:58 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-19 19:15 ` [PATCH] Always print call-clobbered registers in outer frames. (was: Re: [PATCH+DOC] Print registers not saved in the frame as "<not saved>", instead of "<optimized out>".) Pedro Alves
2013-09-19 19:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-09-19 23:13 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-19 23:22 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 11:04 ` [PATCH] Always print call-clobbered registers in outer frames Andrew Burgess
2013-09-24 12:07 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-24 12:56 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-09-24 13:43 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-24 15:18 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-09-24 19:36 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-24 23:22 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-02 16:05 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-02 19:07 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 12:28 ` [PATCH] Always print call-clobbered registers in outer frames. (was: Re: [PATCH+DOC] Print registers not saved in the frame as "<not saved>", instead of "<optimized out>".) Mark Kettenis
2013-09-24 12:06 ` [PATCH] Always print call-clobbered registers in outer frames Pedro Alves
2013-10-02 16:17 ` [PATCH+DOC] Print registers not saved in the frame as "<not saved>", instead of "<optimized out>" Pedro Alves
2013-09-18 16:30 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-09-18 17:36 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201308061318.r76DIMdd016369@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox