Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Edjunior Barbosa Machado)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix hardware watchpoints on PowerPC servers
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201305131319.r4DDJKnN029814@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368426484-32623-1-git-send-email-emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> from "Edjunior Barbosa Machado" at May 13, 2013 03:28:04 AM

Edjunior Machado wrote:

> initially developed only for bookE (embedded processors), the new ptrace
> interface is now available for Power server processors too [1].
> 
> This patch fixes the insertion of hardware watchpoints on Power servers
> using this new interface available on kernel 3.7 and newer (currently, the
> region should be aligned to 8 bytes, which is also the max length). It reduces
> the number of unexpected failures in gdb testsuite in 40 failures (ppc64
> running kernel 3.8).

So the kernel now reports it supports PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE,
but then rejects any attempt to set a range BP of more than 8 bytes?
And there's no way to check for this ahead of time except for checking
the BookE hwcaps bits?   That seems unfortunate ...

But I guess if that's the way the kernel interface is now, we'll have to
add that check.

> 	* ppc-linux-nat.c (ppc_linux_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Check if the
> 	region is ok for a hardware watchpoint using the new ptrace interface
> 	on Power servers.

This is OK.

As noted by Luis, it would be good to rename the "booke" terminology,
maybe using something like "have_ptrace_hwdebug" instead of
have_ptrace_booke_interface.  But that should be a separate patch.

Thanks,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-13 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13  6:29 Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-05-13  7:08 ` Luis Machado
2013-05-13 14:16   ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-05-13 13:19 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2013-05-13 14:17   ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-05-17 23:09     ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201305131319.r4DDJKnN029814@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox