Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: probable rs6000-aix-tdep.c bug found by clang
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018184941.GU3050@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121018153304.GS3050@adacore.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 932 bytes --]

> OK - I will take care of removing the condition and simplifying
> the function.

Here is what I propose we check in.  I can't test it at the moment,
because we've suffered a massive power outage and we're still working
on getting every machine back up. I'm fairly confident, though.

Rather than remove the check, I added an assertion. That's because
eventually I want to add an extra check, for Lynx178. On the GDB side,
the Lynx178 port is roughly a bareboard powerpc configuration. But
it is using XCOFF, and I wanted to make sure that we'd never match
a Lynx178 binary with the AIX ABI. To do that, I use a BFD/XCOFF
function, so I thought adding the explict assertion would help.

While at it, I added a function description, that explicitly mentions
the pre-condition/assertion.

If there are no objections, I will commit the attached patch within
the next few days, after being able to test on AIX again.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-ppc-aix-osabi-sniffer-Turn-test-of-bfd-flavour-into-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1755 bytes --]

From a2aff2ac36f9573ede236e899994054e6194ba65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:31:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ppc-aix osabi sniffer: Turn test of bfd flavour into
 assertion

Due to the way this function is registers, we know that given bfd's
flavour should always be bfd_target_xcoff_flavour, thus making
the former test always true, which means that this function should
always return GDB_OSABI_AIX, and never return GDB_OSABI_UNKNOWN.

This patch also fixes a typo detected by Tom Tromey that caused
the test itself to be completely ineffective.

gdb/ChangeLog (by Tom Tromey and Joel Brobecker):

        * rs6000-aix-tdep.c (rs6000_aix_osabi_sniffer): Replace
        inneffective if condition by gdb assertion.  Add function
        description comment.
---
 gdb/rs6000-aix-tdep.c |   13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/rs6000-aix-tdep.c b/gdb/rs6000-aix-tdep.c
index 59cfa73..06b43de 100644
--- a/gdb/rs6000-aix-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/rs6000-aix-tdep.c
@@ -719,14 +719,19 @@ rs6000_software_single_step (struct frame_info *frame)
   return 1;
 }
 
+/* Implement an osabi sniffer for RS6000/AIX.
+
+   This function assumes that ABFD's flavour is XCOFF.  In other words,
+   it should be registered as a sniffer for bfd_target_xcoff_flavour
+   objfiles only.  A failed assertion will be raised if this condition
+   is not met.  */
+
 static enum gdb_osabi
 rs6000_aix_osabi_sniffer (bfd *abfd)
 {
-  
-  if (bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_xcoff_flavour);
-    return GDB_OSABI_AIX;
+  gdb_assert (bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_xcoff_flavour);
 
-  return GDB_OSABI_UNKNOWN;
+  return GDB_OSABI_AIX;
 }
 
 static void
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-17 20:06 Tom Tromey
2012-10-17 21:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-10-18  9:10   ` Pedro Alves
2012-10-18 15:33     ` Joel Brobecker
2012-10-18 15:46       ` Pedro Alves
2012-10-18 15:58         ` Joel Brobecker
2012-10-18 16:06           ` Pedro Alves
2012-10-18 18:49       ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2012-10-18 19:43         ` Tom Tromey
2012-10-19 20:00         ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121018184941.GU3050@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox