Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix disassemble without parameters in tailcall frame
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120913041735.GA1526@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5051592F.6030701@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 05:55:27 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 11:38 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> >+# Test $pc adjustment which is now right after the function end.
> >+gdb_test "down" "\r\n#2 .*"
> >+gdb_test "disassemble" {Dump of assembler code for function b\(int, double\):.*}
> 
> Do we need to complete the test here to check 'PC doesn't fall in
> the range of function b' or ' => is not displayed'?

I was thinking about it before.  Extended the testcase.


Thanks,
Jan


gdb/
2012-09-12  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	Fix disassemble without parameters in tailcall frame.
	* cli/cli-cmds.c (disassemble_current_function): Use
	get_frame_address_in_block.

gdb/testsuite/
2012-09-12  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	Fix disassemble without parameters in tailcall frame.
	* gdb.arch/amd64-entry-value.exp (down, disassemble): New tests.

diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c b/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
index d3473d5..0bdd373 100644
--- a/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
+++ b/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ disassemble_current_function (int flags)
 
   frame = get_selected_frame (_("No frame selected."));
   gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame);
-  pc = get_frame_pc (frame);
+  pc = get_frame_address_in_block (frame);
   if (find_pc_partial_function (pc, &name, &low, &high) == 0)
     error (_("No function contains program counter for selected frame."));
 #if defined(TUI)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-entry-value.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-entry-value.exp
index dd22d42..455b7a7 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-entry-value.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-entry-value.exp
@@ -213,6 +213,25 @@ gdb_test {p $sp0 == $sp} " = true"
 gdb_test "frame 3" "\r\n#3 .*"
 gdb_test {p $sp0 + sizeof (void *) == $sp} " = true"
 
+# Test $pc adjustment which is now right after the function end.
+# Also verify the current PC indicator "=> " is not displayed anywhere.
+gdb_test "down" "\r\n#2 .*"
+set test "disassemble"
+gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
+    -re "^$test\r\n" {
+	exp_continue
+    }
+    -re "^Dump of assembler code for function b\\(int, double\\):\r\n" {
+	exp_continue
+    }
+    -re "^   0x\[^\r\n\]*\r\n" {
+	exp_continue
+    }
+    -re "^End of assembler dump\\.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+	pass $test
+    }
+}
+
 
 # Test partial-ambiguous virtual tail call frames chain.
 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-13  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-12 15:38 Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-13  3:56 ` Yao Qi
2012-09-13  4:17   ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2012-09-21 19:35     ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120913041735.GA1526@host2.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox