From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: printing pointers to global (data) variable on Windows...
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120816224524.GC2798@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zk5umwj3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> I think the reason for this is here:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-04/msg00175.html
Thanks for the pointer!
> Joel> My second question is regarding the fact that we looking symbols for
> Joel> functions only. This probably made sense if the function was used for
> Joel> text addresses (like disass), but does it now? Or perhaps it's the
> Joel> GNU/Linux output that should be fixed, and only text symbols should
> Joel> be printed when printing addresses (somehow, I do not think that this
> Joel> would be right).
>
> IIRC the full symbol tables only record address information for text
> symbols, not for data symbols. If so, one cannot do this lookup.
I do not understand this part, though. Searches by name should return
global variables too, no?
> Ok, horrible idea. Perhaps some flag bit on the minsym instead?
> Or on the objfile?
You mean, setting a flag that allows us to know that sizes are not
available, and thus avoid the heuristics/filtering? I wish we could
have consistent behavior instead, but that might not be achievable.
I thought about setting the size to -1, but that would open its own
can of worms, I imagine, and that's not doable either, because the
symbol size is an unsigned value (as it should be, if you ask me).
Looking at the definition of struct minimal_symbol, it looks like
we'd have some room for an extra flag. But I am not sure I really
want to go that way. The filtering wouldn't be a problem if we were
searching for all global symbols, not just functions.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-16 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-16 15:23 Joel Brobecker
2012-08-16 20:07 ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-16 22:45 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2012-08-17 14:23 ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-17 23:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-20 15:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-20 17:50 ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-21 15:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-20 17:48 ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-21 15:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-09-05 14:44 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-09-06 1:28 ` asmwarrior
2012-09-06 1:44 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-09-06 2:03 ` asmwarrior
2012-09-10 19:08 ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-10 22:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-09-11 13:49 ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-11 21:27 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120816224524.GC2798@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox