Re: [PATCH] gdb: improve usage strings

[Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1987 bytes --]

On Sunday 12 August 2012 01:06:16 Doug Evans wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 August 2012 13:16:18 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> > From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> >> > Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:54:40 -0400
> >> > 
> >> >    c = add_com ("signal", class_run, signal_command, _("\
> >> > 
> >> > -Continue program giving it signal specified by the argument.\n\
> >> > -An argument of \"0\" means continue program without giving it a
> >> > signal."));
> >> > +Continue program by sending it the specified signal.\n\
> >> 
> >> This "by sending it" is AFAIU inaccurate: we don't continue program
> >> _by_ sending it the signal, we continue the program _and_ send it the
> >> signal.  I actually don't see anything wrong with the original
> >> wording.
> > 
> > ok, but your response shows what i was trying to fix:
> >         - adding "the" before "program"
> >         - changing "giving" to "sending"
> > 
> > the "by" change was incidental
> > 
> > so i'll change it to:
> >         Continue program and send it the specified signal.
> 
> fwiw, I'm not comfortable with that wording.
> To the naive user it's not clear (IMO) that the program is resumed
> with the specified signal, i.e., I can imagine the user wondering if
> there's a gap between when the target is resumed and when the signal
> is delivered.

fwiw, i wondered the same thing when pondering the wording :)

> Do we have a target where there can be a delay? (e.g, the figurative
> equivalent of "continue &; kill SIGNAL)?

thinking about it a bit more (in my head vs reading code), i assume (on linux 
at least) we use PTRACE_CONT which allows for simultaneous resumption and 
signal delivery.  at least, as simultaneous as possible.

> Given that, I like something along the lines of "Continue program by
> sending it the specified signal."

what if i added the word "simultaneously" ?
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]