From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: uweigand@de.ibm.com (Ulrich Weigand)
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker),
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sergiodj@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Remaining 7.5 regressions (Re: [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208021638.q72GcHb4004497@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208011334.q71DYc2H018639@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> from "Ulrich Weigand" at Aug 01, 2012 03:34:38 PM
Some updates:
> - Failures in various core file tests on PowerPC (needs investigation)
This is now fixed here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00070.html
> - Failures in watchpoint.exp on SPU (needs investigation)
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00071.html
> - Failures in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icc-opaque.exp on SPU and s390 (likewise)
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00072.html
> - Testcase harness failures when running a multi-lib configuration:
> ERROR: tcl error sourcing ../../../gdb-7_5/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inferior-died.exp.
> ERROR: can't set "seen": variable is array
> ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/uweigand/fsf/gdb-head/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp.
> ERROR: can't array set "seen": variable isn't array
> (Invalid re-use of a variable name?)
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00073.html
Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Would you guys mind keeping the list up to date on the 7.5 release
> wiki page? This gives everyone an easy location for finding out what
> still needs to be fixed before we can release...
>
> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.5_Release
I'll update the list with those issues that are still failing.
However, most of them seem to be things that actually never worked,
it's just that we didn't have tests to show it (e.g. hardware
watchpoints across forks). Those don't look like release
blockers to me ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-30 15:15 [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-01 5:55 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-01 13:35 ` Remaining 7.5 regressions (Re: [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses) Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-02 6:50 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-02 10:24 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-02 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-02 19:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-02 20:40 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-03 13:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-02 16:38 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208021638.q72GcHb4004497@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox