From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4757 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2012 16:38:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 4591 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2012 16:38:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.106) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:38:24 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:38:23 +0100 Received: from d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.38.233) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:38:21 +0100 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q72GcKnS2945202 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:38:20 +0100 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q72GcIs8004600 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:38:20 -0600 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id q72GcHb4004497; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:38:17 -0600 Message-Id: <201208021638.q72GcHb4004497@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:38:17 +0200 Subject: Re: Remaining 7.5 regressions (Re: [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses) To: uweigand@de.ibm.com (Ulrich Weigand) Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:38:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker), gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sergiodj@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <201208011334.q71DYc2H018639@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> from "Ulrich Weigand" at Aug 01, 2012 03:34:38 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12080216-4966-0000-0000-0000031E515A Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 Some updates: > - Failures in various core file tests on PowerPC (needs investigation) This is now fixed here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00070.html > - Failures in watchpoint.exp on SPU (needs investigation) http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00071.html > - Failures in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icc-opaque.exp on SPU and s390 (likewise) http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00072.html > - Testcase harness failures when running a multi-lib configuration: > ERROR: tcl error sourcing ../../../gdb-7_5/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inferior-died.exp. > ERROR: can't set "seen": variable is array > ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/uweigand/fsf/gdb-head/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp. > ERROR: can't array set "seen": variable isn't array > (Invalid re-use of a variable name?) http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00073.html Joel Brobecker wrote: > Would you guys mind keeping the list up to date on the 7.5 release > wiki page? This gives everyone an easy location for finding out what > still needs to be fixed before we can release... > > http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.5_Release I'll update the list with those issues that are still failing. However, most of them seem to be things that actually never worked, it's just that we didn't have tests to show it (e.g. hardware watchpoints across forks). Those don't look like release blockers to me ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com