From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker), gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Remaining 7.5 regressions (Re: [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m36291gh8m.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208021949.q72JnPOG023944@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Thu, 2 Aug 2012 21:49:25 +0200 (CEST)")
On Thursday, August 02 2012, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Joel Brobecker wrote:
>
>> Would you guys mind keeping the list up to date on the 7.5 release
>> wiki page? This gives everyone an easy location for finding out what
>> still needs to be fixed before we can release...
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.5_Release
>
> I've completed another full test sequence on ARM, Cell (PowerPC & SPU)
> and s390, both native and remote, with the current 7.5 branch. Of the
> issues I originally described, the following "real" problems remain:
>
> - Hardware watchpoints across fork are not supported (ARM, ppc, s390)
> - Missing 32-/64-bit siginfo conversion code (ppc, s390)
> - SPU gdbserver does not support multi-process mode
>
> Since all these are are pre-existing problems, they shouldn't be
> treated as release blockers, so I have *not* put them on the Wiki.
Thanks for this.
> In addition, there's the following testsuite-only issues:
>
> - A few C++ test regressions (potentially compiler issues)
Still couldn't find the problem in GDB.
> - Failures in gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
I have committed the patch for this.
> - Failures in gdb.mi/mi-var-rtti.exp
Probably won't have time to tackle this until tomorrow, but it does not
seem to be a blocker.
> Sergio: I haven't been working on these ... If you feel they
> should go on the Wiki as release blockers, would you mind doing
> so yourself?
No problem. As far as I have investigated, I do not feel they are
release blockers, so I guess we are pretty much covered for the release.
Thanks,
--
Sergio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-30 15:15 [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-01 5:55 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-01 13:35 ` Remaining 7.5 regressions (Re: [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses) Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-02 6:50 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-02 10:24 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-02 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-02 19:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-08-02 20:40 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2012-08-03 13:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-08-02 16:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m36291gh8m.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox