Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be, palves@redhat.com,
	brobecker@adacore.com,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	macro@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120728074134.GA6487@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83k3xoibul.fsf@gnu.org>

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:28:02 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:46:33 +0200
> > From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
> > 
> > -breakpoint should be inserted.  May return @code{NULL} to indicate that
> > -software breakpoints are not supported.
> > +breakpoint should be inserted.  The program counter (@code{*@var{pcptr}}
> > +is inferior PC register encoded on the input and it is a plain address on the
> > +output.  Function may return @code{NULL} to indicate that software breakpoints
> > +are not supported.
> 
> I suggest a slight rewording:
> 
>  On input, the program counter (@code{*@var{pcptr}} is the encoded
>  inferior's PC register.  The function returns the PC's plain address
>  in this argument, or @code{NULL} if software breakpoints are not
>  supported.
> 
> Does this catch the intent correctly?

I do not think that 'pcptr' and 'NULL' should be combined in one sentence,
these are two topics.

BTW I did not change any function behavior, I just try to better document
behavior of the existing functions.

One issue is that:
	Function may return @code{NULL} to indicate that software breakpoints
	are not supported.
This is returned as C function return value.  If NULL is returned other
parameters are irrelevant/unspecified.  And NULL is definitely unrelated to
pcptr.

The other issue, I try to better document the meaning of '*pcptr' input vs.
output value.  This is a value passed by reference.  Also it is not really the
PC register, it is just arbitrary location used for a breakpoint (therefore
pointing at code instructions).

I tried to reword it again and I ended up similar to my former proposal:
	On input, the program counter (@code{*@var{pcptr}} is encoded like the
	inferior's PC register, on output is is encoded as a plain address.
	Function may return @code{NULL} to indicate that software breakpoints
	are not supported.


Thanks,
Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-28  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120718163413.GA17548@adacore.com>
     [not found] ` <1342739016.2220.32.camel@soleil>
     [not found]   ` <20120720071158.GA7053@host2.jankratochvil.net>
     [not found]     ` <1342817409.2149.41.camel@soleil>
     [not found]       ` <20120722173053.GA22036@host2.jankratochvil.net>
     [not found]         ` <1342983655.2301.55.camel@soleil>
2012-07-23  7:22           ` [patch] [i386] Put hlt at the ON_STACK breakpoint [Re: GDB 7.4.91 available for testing] Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-23 16:00             ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-23 16:36               ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-23 20:07                 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-23 20:16                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-23 20:37                     ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 14:49                       ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-25 20:04                         ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 20:11                           ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-25 20:39                             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 14:59                       ` Pedro Alves
2012-07-25 20:24                         ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 21:27                           ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-25 21:46                             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 22:39                               ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-26 21:24                                 ` [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-26 21:50                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-27 18:47                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-28  7:28                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-28  7:42                                         ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2012-07-31  7:37                                       ` [commit+7.5] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-01  9:08                                         ` [commit#2+7.5] testsuite: valgrind-infcall.exp UNSUPPORTED update [Re: [commit+7.5] [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address] Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-02 22:49                                         ` [commit+7.5] [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-02 23:09                                           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-03  0:15                                             ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 11:23                                               ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 12:09                                                 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03  1:00                                             ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-03  1:48                                               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-03  2:30                                                 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 21:45                                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-08-03 14:23                                               ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-03 14:31                                                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 15:02                                                   ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 15:08                                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 16:43                                                       ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 16:46                                                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 18:00                                                           ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 20:23                                           ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 21:46                                             ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-06 18:40                                               ` Tom Tromey
2012-07-31  7:40                                       ` [commit] valgrind-db-attach.exp: Do not run in remote mode [Re: [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address] Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-26 23:14                                   ` [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-07-27 16:02                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-28  0:10                                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-07-28  6:06                                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-30 18:09                                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-07-26 23:15                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-27 16:03                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-27 15:21                                   ` Pedro Alves
2012-07-26 21:56                                 ` [patch] [i386] Put hlt at the ON_STACK breakpoint [Re: GDB 7.4.91 available for testing] Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-26 22:41                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-26  5:13                               ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-26 12:48                           ` Pedro Alves
2012-07-26 22:21                             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-27 14:59                               ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120728074134.GA6487@host2.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox