Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>,
	       Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	       "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Subject: [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 21:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120726212339.GA1710@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120725223933.GD2767@adacore.com>

On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:39:33 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > A valid instruction is not enough. We need a valid instruction
> > that will cause Valgrind to terminate block translation.
> > The breakpoint trap instruction is ok for that.
> > (0xcc for x86 and amd64, 0x0005000d for mips32).
> 
> I think it is fine to update GDB to insert the breakpoint instruction
> instead of leaving random bytes at the breakpoint location.

Attached.  I no longer find it useful as arch-dependent code, it would do the
same in each arch.

No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedorarawhide-linux-gnu.

Philippe, do you have an easy enough way to regression test it on mips when
you was asking for the mips fix?  mips has many execution modes as I see.

I still have to write a testcase for it using valgrind.


> But it sounds like this is forcing GDB to have insider knowledge of
> valgrind.

As you were asking to put there 'int3' (and not 'hlt') the user convenience
coincidentally matches here with what Philippe asks for valgrind.


I am only concerned a bit about this change arcross all archs for 7.5.
Maybe 7.5 could limit this patch only for i386/x86_64 which is well
understood.


Thanks,
Jan


gdb/
2012-07-26  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	* infcall.c (call_function_by_hand): Move BP_ADDR comment to
	AT_ENTRY_POINT.
	(call_function_by_hand) <ON_STACK>: Call write_memory with
	gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc, if possible.
	(call_function_by_hand) <AT_ENTRY_POINT>: The BP_ADDR comment is moved
	here.

gdb/doc/
2012-07-26  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	* gdbint.texinfo (Defining Other Architecture Features): Clarify *pcptr
	encoding for gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc, bp_addr for
	gdbarch_push_dummy_call and bp_addr for gdbarch_push_dummy_code.

diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
index 5e00f1f..b66f80b 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
@@ -4540,8 +4540,10 @@ contents and size of a breakpoint instruction.  It returns a pointer to
 a static string of bytes that encode a breakpoint instruction, stores the
 length of the string to @code{*@var{lenptr}}, and adjusts the program
 counter (if necessary) to point to the actual memory location where the
-breakpoint should be inserted.  May return @code{NULL} to indicate that
-software breakpoints are not supported.
+breakpoint should be inserted.  The program counter (@code{*@var{pcptr}}
+is inferior PC register encoded on the input and it is a plain address on the
+output.  Function may return @code{NULL} to indicate that software breakpoints
+are not supported.
 
 Although it is common to use a trap instruction for a breakpoint, it's
 not required; for instance, the bit pattern could be an invalid
@@ -4821,7 +4823,7 @@ instead of value.
 @anchor{gdbarch_push_dummy_call} Define this to push the dummy frame's call to
 the inferior function onto the stack.  In addition to pushing @var{nargs}, the
 code should push @var{struct_addr} (when @var{struct_return} is non-zero), and
-the return address (@var{bp_addr}).
+the return address (@var{bp_addr}, in inferior PC register encoding).
 
 @var{function} is a pointer to a @code{struct value}; on architectures that use
 function descriptors, this contains the function descriptor value.
@@ -4835,12 +4837,14 @@ instruction sequence (including space for a breakpoint) to which the
 called function should return.
 
 Set @var{bp_addr} to the address at which the breakpoint instruction
-should be inserted, @var{real_pc} to the resume address when starting
-the call sequence, and return the updated inner-most stack address.
+should be inserted (in inferior PC register encoding), @var{real_pc} to the
+resume address when starting the call sequence, and return the updated
+inner-most stack address.
 
 By default, the stack is grown sufficient to hold a frame-aligned
 (@pxref{frame_align}) breakpoint, @var{bp_addr} is set to the address
-reserved for that breakpoint, and @var{real_pc} set to @var{funaddr}.
+reserved for that breakpoint (in inferior PC register encoding), and
+@var{real_pc} set to @var{funaddr}.
 
 This method replaces @w{@code{gdbarch_call_dummy_location (@var{gdbarch})}}.
 
diff --git a/gdb/infcall.c b/gdb/infcall.c
index 51cd118..6ac6624 100644
--- a/gdb/infcall.c
+++ b/gdb/infcall.c
@@ -618,15 +618,37 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *function, int nargs, struct value **args)
      not just the breakpoint but also an extra word containing the
      size (?) of the structure being passed.  */
 
-  /* The actual breakpoint (at BP_ADDR) is inserted separatly so there
-     is no need to write that out.  */
-
   switch (gdbarch_call_dummy_location (gdbarch))
     {
     case ON_STACK:
-      sp = push_dummy_code (gdbarch, sp, funaddr,
-				args, nargs, target_values_type,
-				&real_pc, &bp_addr, get_current_regcache ());
+      {
+	const gdb_byte *bp_bytes;
+	CORE_ADDR bp_addr_as_address;
+	int bp_size;
+
+	/* Be careful BP_ADDR is in inferior PC encoding while
+	   BP_ADDR_AS_ADDRESS is a plain memory address.  */
+
+	sp = push_dummy_code (gdbarch, sp, funaddr, args, nargs,
+			      target_values_type, &real_pc, &bp_addr,
+			      get_current_regcache ());
+
+	/* Write a legitimate instruction at the point where the infcall
+	   breakpoint is going to be inserted.  While this instruction
+	   is never going to be executed, a user investigating the
+	   memory from GDB would see this instruction instead of random
+	   uninitialized bytes.  We chose the breakpoint instruction
+	   just because it may look as the most logical one to the user.
+
+	   If software breakpoints are unsupported for this target we
+	   leave the user visible memory content uninitialized.  */
+
+	bp_addr_as_address = bp_addr;
+	bp_bytes = gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, &bp_addr_as_address,
+					       &bp_size);
+	if (bp_bytes != NULL)
+	  write_memory (bp_addr_as_address, bp_bytes, bp_size);
+      }
       break;
     case AT_ENTRY_POINT:
       {
@@ -634,8 +656,12 @@ call_function_by_hand (struct value *function, int nargs, struct value **args)
 
 	real_pc = funaddr;
 	dummy_addr = entry_point_address ();
+
 	/* A call dummy always consists of just a single breakpoint, so
-	   its address is the same as the address of the dummy.  */
+	   its address is the same as the address of the dummy.
+
+	   The actual breakpoint is inserted separatly so there is no need to
+	   write that out.  */
 	bp_addr = dummy_addr;
 	break;
       }


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-26 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120718163413.GA17548@adacore.com>
     [not found] ` <1342739016.2220.32.camel@soleil>
     [not found]   ` <20120720071158.GA7053@host2.jankratochvil.net>
     [not found]     ` <1342817409.2149.41.camel@soleil>
     [not found]       ` <20120722173053.GA22036@host2.jankratochvil.net>
     [not found]         ` <1342983655.2301.55.camel@soleil>
2012-07-23  7:22           ` [patch] [i386] Put hlt at the ON_STACK breakpoint [Re: GDB 7.4.91 available for testing] Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-23 16:00             ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-23 16:36               ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-23 20:07                 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-23 20:16                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-23 20:37                     ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 14:49                       ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-25 20:04                         ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 20:11                           ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-25 20:39                             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 14:59                       ` Pedro Alves
2012-07-25 20:24                         ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 21:27                           ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-25 21:46                             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-25 22:39                               ` Joel Brobecker
2012-07-26 21:24                                 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2012-07-26 21:50                                   ` [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-27 18:47                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-28  7:28                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-07-28  7:42                                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-31  7:37                                       ` [commit+7.5] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-01  9:08                                         ` [commit#2+7.5] testsuite: valgrind-infcall.exp UNSUPPORTED update [Re: [commit+7.5] [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address] Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-02 22:49                                         ` [commit+7.5] [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-02 23:09                                           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-03  0:15                                             ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 11:23                                               ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 12:09                                                 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03  1:00                                             ` Pedro Alves
2012-08-03  1:48                                               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-08-03  2:30                                                 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 21:45                                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-08-03 14:23                                               ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-03 14:31                                                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 15:02                                                   ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 15:08                                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 16:43                                                       ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 16:46                                                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 18:00                                                           ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-03 20:23                                           ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-03 21:46                                             ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-08-06 18:40                                               ` Tom Tromey
2012-07-31  7:40                                       ` [commit] valgrind-db-attach.exp: Do not run in remote mode [Re: [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address] Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-26 23:14                                   ` [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-07-27 16:02                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-28  0:10                                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-07-28  6:06                                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-30 18:09                                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-07-26 23:15                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-27 16:03                                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-27 15:21                                   ` Pedro Alves
2012-07-26 21:56                                 ` [patch] [i386] Put hlt at the ON_STACK breakpoint [Re: GDB 7.4.91 available for testing] Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-26 22:41                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-26  5:13                               ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-07-26 12:48                           ` Pedro Alves
2012-07-26 22:21                             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2012-07-27 14:59                               ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120726212339.GA1710@host2.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox