From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gbenson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Improved linker-debugger interface
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 21:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507214333.GA3184@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205072131.q47LVjTN014466@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Hi Mark,
I will make only several technical fix ups.
On Mon, 07 May 2012 23:31:45 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> SystemTap relies on utrace,
No longer, there is development version of utrace-less SystemTap.
> So unless you are running RedHat Linux, you'll not only need to build
> a patched glibc, but you also need to build a patched kernel to be able to
> use these new SystemTap probes.
This is unrelated. While you can use glibc SystemTap probes for additional
functionality from kernel you do not have to. You can use arbitrary kernel
(probably not even Linux one as long as you build glibc there), GDB always
fetches the probe points from glibc on its own in userland.
> It means that people using RedHat Linux, almost certainly including any
FYI the brand is "Red Hat", not "RedHat".
> RedHat engineers contributing here will no longer test the codepaths that
> don't rely on SystemTap. And people on other Linux variants will never test
> the codepaths that rely on SystemTap. That'll inevitably lead to more
> breakage.
It is only about FSF glibc, neither related to SystemTap nor related to Red
Hat.
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 15:22 Gary Benson
2012-05-05 4:39 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-05 6:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-05 6:11 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-05 6:23 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 16:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-07 17:51 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-07 20:27 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-07 21:32 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-07 21:44 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2012-05-08 5:45 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-08 13:37 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-09 8:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-09 15:57 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120507214333.GA3184@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gbenson@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox