Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Restore old handling of multi-register variables
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110271159.10997.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111026213726.GV19246@adacore.com>

On Wednesday 26 October 2011 22:37:26, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Here is a new version of the patch that reads values over multiple
> registers if needed. You suggested that read_frame_register_value
> should be in frame.c, but it seemed more logical to put it in findvar.
> I think that the proximity with the ther frame_register routines
> made it more natural, whereas I couldn't find a natural place where
> the new routine would fit in frame.c.  
> But I can move it to frame.c if you think it's a better place.

That's fine.  As long as it's not in value.c :-).

findvar.c is a weird file.  It seems to contains a mix of two
or three different things.  But that's precedent.

> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
>         * value.h (read_frame_register_value): Add declaration.
>         * findvar.c (read_frame_register_value): New function.
>         (value_from_register): Use read_frame_register_value
>         instead of get_frame_register_value + value_contents_copy
>         to get value contents.
> 
> Tested on AVR using AdaCore's testsuite. Tested on x86_64-linux
> using the official testsuite.
> 
> OK?

Looks good to me.

-- 
Pedro Alves


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-27 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-03 21:03 Joel Brobecker
2011-10-06 17:55 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-06 20:11   ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-06 21:00     ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-07 16:38       ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-07 16:52         ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-22 14:48   ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-25 19:34     ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-25 20:37       ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-25 21:09         ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-26 21:44           ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-26 22:11             ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-27 15:57               ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-27 17:51                 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-27  2:56             ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-27 11:10             ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-10-27 17:56               ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-31  3:17             ` [RFA] read_frame_register_value and big endian arches Joel Brobecker
2011-11-07 19:42               ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-07 21:24                 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-10 17:15                 ` Checked in: " Joel Brobecker
2011-11-16 18:23                   ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-18  2:01                     ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-18 17:40                       ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-11-18 19:41                         ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-18 20:06                           ` [commit] " Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201110271159.10997.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox