From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Verify byte-by-byte if both files are the same on "remote:" [Re: [rfc] False separate debuginfo warning with "remote:"
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111010202141.GA27651@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110101347.p9ADlvOP015144@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:47:57 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> >From an API simplicity point of view, I'd somewhat prefer for the function to
> rewind the file position itself instead of requiring the caller to do it ...
done, yes, I had some wrong performance assumptions.
> > @@ -1345,25 +1359,35 @@ separate_debug_file_exists (const char *name, unsigned long crc,
> > negatives. */
> >
> > if (bfd_stat (abfd, &abfd_stat) == 0
> > - && bfd_stat (parent_objfile->obfd, &parent_stat) == 0
> > - && abfd_stat.st_dev == parent_stat.st_dev
> > - && abfd_stat.st_ino == parent_stat.st_ino
> > - && abfd_stat.st_ino != 0)
> > + && abfd_stat.st_ino != 0
> > + && bfd_stat (parent_objfile->obfd, &parent_stat) == 0)
> > {
> > - bfd_close (abfd);
> > - return 0;
> > + if (abfd_stat.st_dev == parent_stat.st_dev
> > + && abfd_stat.st_ino == parent_stat.st_ino)
> > + {
> > + bfd_close (abfd);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + verified_as_different = 1;
> > }
> > + else
> > + verified_as_different = 0;
>
> So this no longer handles the st_ino == 0 case. I think we still need to do
> that, to cope with filesystems (e.g. on Windows?) where stat works, but does
> not provide inode numbers ... Two files with zero st_ino should not be
> considered equal.
I believe the code is right. st_ino == 0 will verified_as_different = 0,
therefore this code does not make any assumption about such files.
FYI I reordered the condition for some negligible btter performance.
> As another performance optimization, maybe it would make sense to cache
> the parent's CRC (e.g. in the objfile) to avoid redundant computation?
OK, done.
No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora16pre-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Jan
gdb/
2011-10-10 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix separate debuginfo warning with "remote:" access.
* objfiles.h (struct objfile): New fields crc32 and crc32_p.
* symfile.c (get_file_crc): New function with the code moved from ...
(separate_debug_file_exists): ... this function, specifically variables
buffer and count. New variable verified_as_different, set it. Remove
file_crc initialization. Verify also if both files are not the same
manually, if needed.
--- a/gdb/objfiles.h
+++ b/gdb/objfiles.h
@@ -244,6 +244,11 @@ struct objfile
long mtime;
+ /* Cached 32-bit CRC as computed by gnu_debuglink_crc32. CRC32 is valid
+ iff CRC32_P. */
+ unsigned long crc32;
+ int crc32_p;
+
/* Obstack to hold objects that should be freed when we load a new symbol
table from this object file. */
--- a/gdb/symfile.c
+++ b/gdb/symfile.c
@@ -1310,15 +1310,52 @@ get_debug_link_info (struct objfile *objfile, unsigned long *crc32_out)
return contents;
}
+/* Return 32-bit CRC for ABFD. If successful store it to *FILE_CRC_RETURN and
+ return 1. Otherwise print a warning and return 0. ABFD seek position is
+ not preserved. */
+
+static int
+get_file_crc (bfd *abfd, unsigned long *file_crc_return)
+{
+ unsigned long file_crc = 0;
+
+ if (bfd_seek (abfd, 0, SEEK_SET) != 0)
+ {
+ warning (_("Problem reading \"%s\" for CRC: %s"),
+ bfd_get_filename (abfd), bfd_errmsg (bfd_get_error ()));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ for (;;)
+ {
+ gdb_byte buffer[8 * 1024];
+ bfd_size_type count;
+
+ count = bfd_bread (buffer, sizeof (buffer), abfd);
+ if (count == (bfd_size_type) -1)
+ {
+ warning (_("Problem reading \"%s\" for CRC: %s"),
+ bfd_get_filename (abfd), bfd_errmsg (bfd_get_error ()));
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (count == 0)
+ break;
+ file_crc = gnu_debuglink_crc32 (file_crc, buffer, count);
+ }
+
+ *file_crc_return = file_crc;
+ return 1;
+}
+
static int
separate_debug_file_exists (const char *name, unsigned long crc,
struct objfile *parent_objfile)
{
- unsigned long file_crc = 0;
+ unsigned long file_crc;
+ int file_crc_p;
bfd *abfd;
- gdb_byte buffer[8*1024];
- int count;
struct stat parent_stat, abfd_stat;
+ int verified_as_different;
/* Find a separate debug info file as if symbols would be present in
PARENT_OBJFILE itself this function would not be called. .gnu_debuglink
@@ -1345,25 +1382,46 @@ separate_debug_file_exists (const char *name, unsigned long crc,
negatives. */
if (bfd_stat (abfd, &abfd_stat) == 0
- && bfd_stat (parent_objfile->obfd, &parent_stat) == 0
- && abfd_stat.st_dev == parent_stat.st_dev
- && abfd_stat.st_ino == parent_stat.st_ino
- && abfd_stat.st_ino != 0)
+ && abfd_stat.st_ino != 0
+ && bfd_stat (parent_objfile->obfd, &parent_stat) == 0)
{
- bfd_close (abfd);
- return 0;
+ if (abfd_stat.st_dev == parent_stat.st_dev
+ && abfd_stat.st_ino == parent_stat.st_ino)
+ {
+ bfd_close (abfd);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ verified_as_different = 1;
}
+ else
+ verified_as_different = 0;
- while ((count = bfd_bread (buffer, sizeof (buffer), abfd)) > 0)
- file_crc = gnu_debuglink_crc32 (file_crc, buffer, count);
+ file_crc_p = get_file_crc (abfd, &file_crc);
bfd_close (abfd);
+ if (!file_crc_p)
+ return 0;
+
if (crc != file_crc)
{
- warning (_("the debug information found in \"%s\""
- " does not match \"%s\" (CRC mismatch).\n"),
- name, parent_objfile->name);
+ /* If one (or both) the files are accessed for example the via "remote:"
+ gdbserver way it does not support the bfd_stat operation. Verify
+ whether those two files are not the same manually. */
+
+ if (!verified_as_different && !parent_objfile->crc32_p)
+ {
+ parent_objfile->crc32_p = get_file_crc (parent_objfile->obfd,
+ &parent_objfile->crc32);
+ if (!parent_objfile->crc32_p)
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (verified_as_different || parent_objfile->crc32 != crc)
+ warning (_("the debug information found in \"%s\""
+ " does not match \"%s\" (CRC mismatch).\n"),
+ name, parent_objfile->name);
+
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 13:53 [rfc] False separate debuginfo warning with "remote:" access Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-10 8:38 ` [patch] Verify byte-by-byte if both files are the same on "remote:" [Re: [rfc] False separate debuginfo warning with "remote:" access] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-10 8:49 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-10 13:48 ` [patch] Verify byte-by-byte if both files are the same on "remote:" [Re: [rfc] False separate debuginfo warning with "remote:" Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-10 20:22 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-10-10 21:23 ` [patch] Verify byte-by-byte if both files are the same on "remote:" [Re: [rfc] False separate debuginfo warning with "remot Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-11 12:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-11 19:07 ` [commit] Fix condition (Re: [patch] Verify byte-by-byte if both files are the same on "remote:") Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-11 20:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111010202141.GA27651@host1.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox