Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: yao@codesourcery.com (Yao Qi)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix that different function breakpoints are set@same pc address  (PR gdb/12703)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110101446.p9AEklVX022612@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E04692F.3030500@codesourcery.com> from "Yao Qi" at Jun 24, 2011 06:38:39 PM

Yao Qi wrote:

> 	gdb/
> 	* arm-tdep.c (thumb_analyze_prologue): Check condition for 32-bit
> 	Thumb-2 instructions. 

Huh.  That check is indeed wrong.  

> -      else if ((insn & 0xe000) == 0xe000)
> +      else if ((insn & 0xe000) == 0xe000 && (insn & 0x1800) != 0)
>  	{

Instead of open-coding the check, I think it would be preferable to
use the thumb_insn_size routine instead.

Note that there are a number of other places that either already open-
code the correct check, or -worse- use the same incorrect check as the
code above:

- thumb_in_function_epilogue_p
- thumb_get_next_pc_raw
- arm_breakpoint_from_pc

Would you mind converting them all to thumb_insn_size?

Thanks,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-24  2:31 [PATCH] Fix that different function breakpoints are set at same " Terry Guo
2011-06-24  3:55 ` Yao Qi
2011-06-24  8:59   ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-24 10:39     ` Yao Qi
2011-09-27 12:53       ` [ping]: " Yao Qi
2011-10-09 15:06         ` [ping 2]: " Yao Qi
2011-10-10 14:47       ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2011-10-12  0:47         ` [PATCH] Fix that different function breakpoints are set@same " Yao Qi
2011-10-12 11:58           ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-13  8:19             ` [committed] : " Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201110101446.p9AEklVX022612@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox