Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 10/12] entryval: @entry values even for references
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110729153506.GF14528@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN9gPaHfgH-6bOqRX1qe2z-xxdKY4ojU=pVwkcdw3w4AO-kEOg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:04:06 +0200, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> > for parameters passed by reference the parameter itself does not change; only
> > the referenced (pointed to) value changes.  This would not be caught at all.
> 
> This is a little off topic from the current patch, but if the
> reference value is not known, and the reference entry value is known,
> should we use the entry value automatically?  Since it's supposed to
> be read-only.  This could potentially hide a corrupted reference
> pointer, that's the only downside.

IIUC added there:
+  /* Check if DW_AT_GNU_call_site_data_value cannot be used.  If it should be
+     used and it is not available do not fall back to OUTER_VAL - dereferencing
+     TYPE_CODE_REF with non-entry data value would give current value - not the
+     entry value.  */

That is if DW_AT_GNU_call_site_data_value could be used and it is not there do
cancel any call site computation at all.

+gdb_test "p nodataparam@entry" "Cannot resolve DW_AT_GNU_call_site_data_value" "entry_reference: p nodataparam@entry"

This works for TYPE_CODE_REF.  But still for some:
	(gdb) print glib_hash_pointer@entry
a pretty printer gets into effect which will print the current data values
referenced by the (unchanged) @entry pointer; this issue is not solved.


It will be in a new patchset resubmit.


Thanks,
Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-29 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-18 20:26 Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-19  1:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2011-07-29 15:55   ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-07-19 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-29 15:31   ` Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110729153506.GF14528@host1.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox