From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: aristovski@qnx.com (Aleksandar Ristovski)
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com (Pedro Alves),
brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104261734.p3QHYR33002293@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302053790.16582.71.camel@qnxws7629> from "Aleksandar Ristovski" at Apr 05, 2011 09:36:30 PM
Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> I tested your patch on self-hosted x86 Neutrino and it did not show any
> regressions.
Great! Thanks for your support.
> BTW, can you incorporate this in your patch to remove compile issues:
>
> @@ -72,9 +72,11 @@ static ptid_t do_attach (ptid_t ptid);
>
> static int procfs_can_use_hw_breakpoint (int, int, int);
>
> -static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type);
> +static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type,
> + struct expression *);
>
> -static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type);
> +static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type,
> + struct expression *);
>
> static int procfs_stopped_by_watchpoint (void);
Sure; I've checked this part in right away.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-19 1:54 [rfc][rft " Ulrich Weigand
2011-03-22 17:25 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-24 16:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-03-31 19:42 ` [rfc v2][rft " Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-04 9:47 ` Pedro Alves
2011-04-05 19:22 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-05 19:33 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2011-04-05 22:56 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-06 1:37 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2011-04-06 17:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-26 17:34 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2011-04-06 6:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-04-06 17:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-27 1:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-04-27 13:31 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-03-22 17:37 ` [rfc][rft " Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201104261734.p3QHYR33002293@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=aristovski@qnx.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox